H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Melinda Czink H2H: 1-0

Elena Dementieva holds a 1–0 lead over Melinda Czink in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Dementieva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 China Open second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Dementieva
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Melinda Czink
HUN Age 43 Left-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Elena Dementieva #4 6-4 6-3 Melinda Czink #40 Match data Oct 7, 2009* R32 China Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,125 483 245 66.3% 0 1 3 0 7 5 16
Melinda Czink #691 #37 1,571 1,796 89 137 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Melinda Czink
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,583 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2000 38–20 65.5% #11 1,897 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,840 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,764 0 0 2003 4–3 57.1% #79 1,568 0 0
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 2004 2–16 11.1% #128 1,427 0 0
22 2004 40–23 63.5% #6 1,975 0 4 2005 9–12 42.9% #96 1,478 0 0
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,916 0 4 2006 14–18 43.8% #105 1,500 0 0
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,922 0 6 2007 3–9 25.0% #124 1,456 0 0
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,969 0 8 2008 10–11 47.6% #106 1,558 0 0
26 2008 56–17 76.7% #4 2,050 0 11 2009 29–21 58.0% #37 1,758 0 1
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,987 0 14 2010 3–16 15.8% #312 1,533 0 1
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,955 0 16 2011 3–6 33.3% #143 1,525 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2012 9–16 36.0% #94 1,543 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2013 3–9 25.0% #254 1,500 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Dementieva Melinda Czink
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1997 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 6 5 11 54.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 25 10 35 71.4% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 18 12 30 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 15 13 28 53.6% 10 7 17 58.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 2003 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2003 24 13 37 64.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2004 27 14 41 65.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2005 9 6 15 60.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2005 28 15 43 65.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2006 9 12 21 42.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2006 24 13 37 64.9% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2007 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2007 24 11 35 68.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2008 33 10 43 76.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
27 2009 35 11 46 76.1% 10 4 14 71.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 2010 28 15 43 65.1% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 3 9 12 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 287 142 429 66.9% 103 55 158 65.2% 41 20 61 67.2% 52 28 80 65.0% — 56 77 133 42.1% 22 44 66 33.3% 11 16 27 40.7% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 319/527 of Elena Dementieva's and 143/226 of Melinda Czink's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Elena Dementieva Melinda Czink
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 3/7 1.0 1.7 65.3% 58.7% 40.7% 45.8% 31.9% 52.1% 41.9%
21 2003 8/72 1.3 3.9 63.6% 65.3% 42.0% 57.8% 70.6% 56.9% 47.7% 2004 4/18 1.0 2.0 70.2% 54.4% 42.8% 39.0% 56.8% 50.8% 44.0%
22 2004 13/63 0.8 9.8 57.2% 62.8% 38.5% 44.9% 55.2% 52.5% 49.7% 2005 1/21 1.0 4.0 71.4% 54.3% 28.6% 50.0% 100.0% 46.9% 29.6%
23 2005 21/63 0.8 8.7 57.0% 62.1% 39.9% 50.1% 50.1% 52.2% 50.7% 2006 6/32 2.0 3.3 71.5% 59.4% 46.2% 60.2% 50.6% 55.2% 42.5%
24 2006 46/66 0.8 8.4 60.8% 61.8% 41.0% 50.6% 49.1% 53.7% 49.9% 2007 4/12 1.0 4.5 62.6% 62.1% 45.1% 40.4% 36.1% 55.8% 36.3%
25 2007 54/59 1.5 7.1 56.6% 64.7% 44.3% 48.3% 57.1% 55.7% 50.7% 2008 16/21 2.8 5.2 62.8% 66.0% 42.4% 50.4% 55.5% 57.1% 39.5%
26 2008 59/73 1.5 4.1 64.0% 63.4% 45.2% 57.6% 53.0% 56.9% 48.6% 2009 44/50 3.5 5.5 61.7% 64.9% 47.8% 49.9% 51.8% 58.1% 42.7%
27 2009 67/73 1.9 5.8 60.2% 67.3% 47.2% 57.5% 53.7% 59.5% 49.3% 2010 19/19 2.8 6.3 61.0% 61.3% 39.9% 46.1% 28.6% 52.9% 38.0%
28 2010 51/58 1.5 4.7 64.7% 63.3% 47.4% 56.6% 54.7% 57.9% 50.0% 2011 9/9 2.3 6.8 61.8% 61.7% 47.4% 43.6% 45.3% 56.0% 40.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 25/25 2.7 4.2 59.6% 64.5% 48.9% 53.6% 46.3% 58.1% 39.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 12/12 3.3 4.7 62.4% 63.3% 40.1% 50.6% 43.7% 54.8% 36.9%
Career — 319/728 1.4 6.2 60.8% 64.1% 44.5% 53.8% 53.9% 56.5% 49.7% — 143/226 2.8 5.0 62.2% 63.3% 45.1% 49.5% 46.6% 56.3% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Dementieva Melinda Czink
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1997 1493 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1998 1479 106.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 1–1 — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1999 1584 124.5 — — — — -21 -3 — 54.0% +0.38 1–7 (13%) 0–1 — +1.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2000 1897 159.0 — — — — -23 -186 — 59.6% +0.65 17–7 (71%) 7–5 (58%) 112.6 -1.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2001 1841 149.4 — — — — +14 -69 -259 58.3% +0.58 8–10 (44%) 4–6 (40%) 95.9 +1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2002 1764 143.8 — — — — +7 -19 -9 60.1% +0.78 7–16 (30%) 9–12 (43%) 87.6 +3.61 2003 1568 119.7 -0.23 +0.05 0.875 46.6% +6 -6 — 44.4% -0.50 4–0 (100%) 1–0 — -0.33
21 2003 1967 156.8 +1.60 +2.78 1.106 52.3% -16 -140 -134 61.8% +0.81 15–12 (56%) 10–3 (77%) 107.7 -1.46 2004 1428 98.7 -0.95 -0.17 0.894 47.4% +79 +17 — 21.4% -2.07 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.23
22 2004 1976 161.0 -0.64 +4.50 1.046 51.0% +8 -84 — 58.0% +0.42 14–4 (78%) 7–3 (70%) 108.8 -2.48 2005 1478 105.8 -1.18 -2.27 0.558 37.9% +88 -105 — 41.7% -0.67 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.2 +0.54
23 2005 1916 156.8 -1.41 +5.17 1.059 51.3% +26 -5 -155 59.7% +0.74 18–6 (75%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 +2.18 2006 1501 112.0 -1.09 -1.39 0.950 49.1% +30 -48 +15 45.9% -0.36 6–6 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +1.02
24 2006 1922 155.6 -0.92 +5.86 1.077 51.8% +31 -42 -40 61.4% +0.70 18–3 (86%) 9–1 (90%) 116.2 +1.22 2007 1457 101.5 -0.83 -2.90 0.821 45.7% +57 -51 — 31.0% -1.10 2–3 (40%) 1–4 (20%) 96.9 +0.11
25 2007 1969 151.5 +0.08 +6.52 1.145 53.1% +12 +5 -105 66.4% +1.22 10–3 (77%) 6–5 (55%) 104.2 +1.18 2008 1559 122.7 +0.81 -3.19 0.920 48.5% +7 -110 -18 47.9% -0.21 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 103.0 +0.10
26 2008 2051 160.2 +2.18 +5.30 1.128 52.8% -4 -41 -104 71.0% +1.43 17–8 (68%) 10–8 (56%) 103.5 -2.32 2009 1759 133.3 +2.15 -0.64 1.020 50.5% -34 -162 -152 58.7% +0.35 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 104.0 -0.55
27 2009 1988 160.0 +3.77 +5.90 1.216 54.3% +41 -23 -33 71.7% +1.67 9–10 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 93.9 -0.09 2010 1533 110.0 -1.99 -4.02 0.807 45.6% +115 -53 +11 23.3% -1.44 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 96.8 -0.52
28 2010 1956 165.7 +2.28 +6.35 1.189 54.0% +28 -23 — 65.6% +1.32 12–6 (67%) 4–10 (29%) 96.4 -1.18 2011 1526 106.8 +0.76 +0.06 0.926 48.6% +77 — +41 40.9% -0.68 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.2 +0.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1544 120.7 +2.01 -3.55 0.942 49.0% +9 -66 +104 40.7% -0.48 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.29
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1500 108.6 -0.99 -4.61 0.816 46.1% +48 -61 — 30.0% -1.37 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 97.5 -0.51
Career — 2125 161.4 +1.36 +5.78 1.141 53.0% +11 -53 -91 62.8% +0.92 146–93 (61%) 82–64 (56%) 106.3 +0.35 — 1796 120.5 +0.70 -2.25 0.922 48.4% +30 -76 -4 42.0% -0.58 39–45 (46%) 29–32 (48%) 99.0 -0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.