H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Shahar Peer H2H: 6-1

Elena Dementieva holds a 6–1 lead over Shahar Peer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 4–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Elena Dementieva won the 2009 Toronto fourth round 6-1 1-6 6-4.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
ISR Age 39 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 21, 2009* Toronto WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #5 6-1 1-6 6-4 Shahar Peer #68 Match data
Jan 10, 2009* Auckland WTA 250 QF Hard Elena Dementieva #4 6-3 6-1 Shahar Peer #39 Match data
Jul 1, 2008* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Elena Dementieva #5 6-2 6-1 Shahar Peer #26 Match data
Jan 20, 2008* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Elena Dementieva #11 6-2 6-0 Shahar Peer #17 Match data
Oct 13, 2006* Moscow WTA 1000 R16 Carpet Elena Dementieva #7 4-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Shahar Peer #23 Match data
Aug 11, 2006* Los Angeles WTA 500 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #6 7-5 6-3 Shahar Peer #25 Match data
Jun 3, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Shahar Peer #26 6-4 7-5 Elena Dementieva #8 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Shahar Peer #1,185 #11 3,410 1,966 268 204 56.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Shahar Peer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 2004 3–3 50.0% #176 1,509 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 2005 22–20 52.4% #45 1,636 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 2006 38–20 65.5% #20 1,826 0 3
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 2007 39–21 65.0% #17 1,830 0 3
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3 2008 24–20 54.5% #38 1,707 0 3
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4 2009 36–21 63.2% #30 1,787 0 5
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4 2010 47–21 69.1% #13 1,885 0 5
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6 2011 23–21 52.3% #37 1,706 0 5
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8 2012 15–22 40.5% #74 1,584 0 5
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10 2013 10–14 41.7% #77 1,558 0 5
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13 2014 10–18 35.7% #117 1,539 0 5
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15 2015 1–3 25.0% #177 1,526 0 5