H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Elena Dementieva vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 2-2

Elena Dementieva and Tatiana Golovin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Elena Dementieva leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2006 Miami fourth round 6-2 6-1.

RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
FRA Age 38 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 2006* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Tatiana Golovin #24 6-2 6-1 Elena Dementieva #8 Match data
Mar 27, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #5 3-6 6-2 6-1 Tatiana Golovin #23 Match data
Mar 13, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Dementieva #5 2-6 6-4 6-4 Tatiana Golovin #25 Match data
Feb 14, 2004* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Tatiana Golovin #135 6-4 6-4 Elena Dementieva #10 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Dementieva #10 #3 8,286 2,108 472 243 66.0% 0 3 0 9 3 15
Tatiana Golovin #1,128 #12 1,882 2,012 131 80 62.1% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Dementieva Tatiana Golovin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1997 0–1 0.0% #349 1,492 0 0 2003 1–4 20.0% #358 1,479 0 0
16 1998 0–2 0.0% #186 1,478 0 0 2004 27–15 64.3% #27 1,753 0 0
17 1999 11–11 50.0% #62 1,584 0 0 2005 33–22 60.0% #24 1,771 0 0
18 2000 33–19 63.5% #11 1,859 0 0 2006 25–18 58.1% #22 1,830 0 0
19 2001 34–22 60.7% #15 1,833 0 0 2007 43–17 71.7% #13 1,981 0 2
20 2002 36–26 58.1% #19 1,763 0 0 2008 2–4 33.3% #254 1,890 0 2
21 2003 47–25 65.3% #8 1,966 0 3
22 2004 40–22 64.5% #6 1,986 0 4
23 2005 41–22 65.1% #8 1,925 0 4
24 2006 45–21 68.2% #8 1,908 0 6
25 2007 41–18 69.5% #11 1,964 0 8
26 2008 50–17 74.6% #4 2,014 0 10
27 2009 55–18 75.3% #5 1,981 0 13
28 2010 39–19 67.2% #9 1,928 0 15