H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Elena Likhovtseva vs Pam Shriver H2H: 1-0

Elena Likhovtseva holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Shriver in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Likhovtseva leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Likhovtseva won the 1994 Manhattan Beach third round 6-0 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Likhovtseva
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 11, 1994* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R32 Hard Elena Likhovtseva #70 6-0 3-6 7-5 Pam Shriver #48 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Likhovtseva #1,092 #15 1,807 1,912 358 338 51.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Likhovtseva Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1993 11–8 57.9% #67 1,633 0 1 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1994 17–19 47.2% #62 1,736 0 1 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1995 18–18 50.0% #45 1,718 0 1 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1996 30–21 58.8% #18 1,819 0 1 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1997 24–24 50.0% #31 1,749 0 2 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1998 35–29 54.7% #26 1,829 0 2 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1999 34–29 54.0% #18 1,755 0 2 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 2000 29–27 51.8% #21 1,770 0 2 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 2001 25–24 51.0% #36 1,746 0 2 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 2002 24–27 47.1% #42 1,666 0 2 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 2003 26–26 50.0% #37 1,678 0 2 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 2004 26–24 52.0% #24 1,828 0 3 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 2005 30–22 57.7% #17 1,795 0 3 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 2006 16–20 44.4% #43 1,695 0 3 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 2007 13–17 43.3% #62 1,665 0 3 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 2008 0–3 0.0% #1044 1,634 0 3 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 — — — — — — — 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24