H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Alisa Kleybanova H2H: 0-1

Alisa Kleybanova holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alisa Kleybanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alisa Kleybanova won the 2008 Stanford round of 32 4-6 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 40 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Alisa Kleybanova
Russia Age 37 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alisa Kleybanova #35 4-6 6-2 6-3 Elena Vesnina #55 Match data Jul 17, 2008* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,855 263 261 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Alisa Kleybanova #784 #20 2,485 1,877 108 92 54.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Alisa Kleybanova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2004 1–1 50.0% #368 1,514 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2005 0–1 0.0% #237 1,499 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2006 0–2 0.0% #240 1,472 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,512 0 0 2008 17–16 51.5% #32 1,646 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2009 31–24 56.4% #29 1,780 0 0
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2010 32–23 58.2% #25 1,828 0 2
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,559 0 0 2011 14–12 53.8% #68 1,780 0 2
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,769 0 0 2012 1–1 50.0% #545 1,777 0 2
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,722 0 0 2013 4–4 50.0% #188 1,770 0 2
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,665 0 0 2014 8–8 50.0% #139 1,771 0 2
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,697 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,802 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,691 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,611 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2016 28–17 62.2% #16 1,767 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2017 25–25 50.0% #18 1,702 0 3 — — — — — — —
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,685 0 3 — — — — — — —
34 2021 4–4 50.0% #310 1,683 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Elena Vesnina Alisa Kleybanova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
19 2006 12 14 26 46.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 22 16 38 57.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2007 11 12 23 47.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 25 16 41 61.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2008 9 12 21 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 10 8 18 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2009 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2010 16 13 29 55.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2011 9 14 23 39.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2014 6 4 10 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 6 10 16 37.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 22 13 35 62.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 7 9 16 43.8% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 11 11 22 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 20 17 37 54.1% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 5 7 12 41.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 157 160 317 49.5% 71 73 144 49.3% 33 24 57 57.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — 77 61 138 55.8% 21 22 43 48.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/511 of Elena Vesnina's and 184/197 of Alisa Kleybanova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Elena Vesnina Alisa Kleybanova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/2 3.0 7.0 44.1% 73.1% 33.3% 44.4% 25.0% 50.8% 42.0%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 32/33 4.7 4.5 51.3% 66.3% 45.9% 52.3% 51.0% 56.4% 44.8%
19 2006 26/44 1.7 5.1 61.8% 59.6% 48.5% 51.3% 46.9% 55.1% 42.8% 2009 53/55 4.1 3.5 57.0% 64.0% 48.4% 53.8% 49.8% 57.1% 44.6%
20 2007 28/38 1.8 4.3 58.7% 62.6% 44.0% 50.2% 48.9% 54.9% 40.8% 2010 50/55 3.2 3.6 57.2% 66.1% 48.1% 56.6% 48.4% 58.4% 44.4%
21 2008 28/31 2.8 5.0 61.2% 59.1% 42.8% 52.2% 49.7% 53.0% 44.3% 2011 25/26 3.2 3.0 55.8% 66.2% 45.5% 53.6% 54.0% 56.9% 46.2%
22 2009 47/51 3.0 4.4 61.7% 64.1% 45.6% 51.2% 46.2% 56.9% 45.6% 2012 2/2 5.5 5.5 49.5% 66.1% 44.4% 68.8% 40.2% 55.1% 37.5%
23 2010 42/44 2.3 3.5 62.8% 64.3% 47.1% 51.9% 44.2% 57.9% 44.1% 2013 7/8 5.6 4.1 50.8% 63.2% 35.4% 51.3% 42.8% 49.6% 43.0%
24 2011 38/40 2.1 4.0 63.5% 60.4% 44.4% 46.8% 48.1% 54.3% 45.6% 2014 14/16 3.3 3.8 58.1% 64.7% 40.3% 64.2% 53.9% 54.8% 42.8%
25 2012 30/31 2.0 3.5 64.9% 62.1% 44.5% 45.7% 50.9% 56.0% 42.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 43/49 2.0 3.5 64.0% 64.2% 43.7% 56.0% 51.2% 56.8% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 29/33 2.4 4.3 61.2% 59.5% 47.6% 50.9% 48.2% 54.8% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 22/28 2.5 4.5 64.1% 63.6% 46.8% 50.6% 46.0% 57.8% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 43/45 2.7 3.0 63.9% 62.4% 48.1% 53.2% 47.4% 57.3% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 49/50 2.4 4.0 62.4% 63.4% 46.7% 55.2% 47.6% 57.0% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 19/19 1.8 3.3 59.8% 62.3% 46.2% 59.4% 42.2% 55.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 5/8 3.8 2.0 63.9% 65.1% 52.4% 56.3% 51.7% 60.2% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Elena Vesnina Alisa Kleybanova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1514 101.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 1–0 — — -0.15
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1499 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1473 97.0 -1.84 -0.90 0.854 45.7% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.02
17 2004 1485 94.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2005 1512 111.3 — — — — +18 +11 — 53.6% +0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–5 (17%) 94.6 +0.78 2008 1647 137.2 +0.59 +0.97 1.026 50.5% -43 -112 +90 50.0% +0.24 7–3 (70%) 0–3 (0%) 103.5 -0.20
19 2006 1617 126.3 -0.84 -1.03 0.952 48.9% -20 -59 -4 45.6% -0.31 10–11 (48%) 6–4 (60%) 103.7 -0.40 2009 1781 141.6 +1.51 +0.24 1.040 50.9% -6 -169 -80 56.4% +0.35 10–13 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 100.3 +2.38
20 2007 1632 116.4 -0.58 -2.70 0.905 48.1% -18 -83 +38 45.8% -0.52 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 101.7 +0.91 2010 1828 151.3 +2.66 +0.90 1.067 51.6% +4 -191 -99 56.8% +0.62 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 96.7 -1.00
21 2008 1559 120.2 -1.61 -0.27 0.943 48.7% +44 -54 +62 40.0% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 2–5 (29%) 98.3 +0.31 2011 1780 142.2 +1.00 +1.86 1.072 51.5% +40 -131 — 53.3% +0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.66
22 2009 1769 139.8 +1.52 +2.06 1.060 51.2% -22 -132 -92 56.4% +0.36 13–6 (68%) 7–5 (58%) 111.1 -0.62 2012 1777 108.2 -0.89 -1.44 0.834 48.0% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — -0.25
23 2010 1722 133.3 +1.99 +0.53 1.050 50.9% +24 -115 — 51.5% +0.16 4–9 (31%) 4–4 (50%) 95.0 +0.78 2013 1770 112.0 -1.63 +0.12 0.852 46.4% +18 — — 42.1% -1.16 3–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 102.1 -0.13
24 2011 1666 128.4 -0.70 +1.97 0.998 49.9% -46 +18 — 48.2% +0.06 6–5 (55%) 2–9 (18%) 96.7 -0.40 2014 1772 126.6 +0.26 +0.71 0.947 49.3% +40 -113 — 50.0% -0.23 1–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.87
25 2012 1698 129.1 +0.84 +0.09 0.961 49.2% -74 +10 -44 45.3% -0.45 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 98.7 -2.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2013 1803 145.9 +1.77 +2.37 1.059 51.3% -28 -167 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–5 (71%) 5–3 (63%) 108.9 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1691 123.1 -1.11 -0.16 0.953 49.1% +9 -36 +78 48.7% -0.21 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) 101.7 +0.88 2017 1764 109.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1612 121.6 -0.23 -1.00 0.974 49.4% +14 +26 — 41.5% -0.49 4–5 (44%) 2–4 (33%) 98.4 -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1768 136.6 +1.65 +2.12 1.053 51.1% -87 -6 +106 58.0% +0.37 8–4 (67%) 6–6 (50%) 105.9 -0.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1703 142.6 +0.47 +0.66 1.010 50.2% +15 +11 +176 50.0% +0.24 9–6 (60%) 2–8 (20%) 98.6 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2018 1686 126.3 -0.27 -0.49 0.954 49.3% +7 -3 — 44.2% -0.49 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.3 +0.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1683 111.9 +1.14 +0.26 1.014 49.6% — -35 — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1856 136.9 +0.45 +0.62 1.000 50.0% -13 -43 +33 49.5% -0.03 90–75 (55%) 52–64 (45%) 102.6 -0.59 — 1878 145.8 +1.33 +0.77 1.030 50.7% +3 -147 0 53.0% +0.27 35–28 (56%) 16–23 (41%) 99.6 -0.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.