H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 4-5

Dominika Cibulkova holds a 5–4 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Dominika Cibulkova leads 5–1 on hard courts, while Elena Vesnina leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2018 Sydney fourth round 6-4 6-4.

RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 5
9 main draw meetings
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 11, 2018* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #26 6-4 6-4 Elena Vesnina #17 Match data
Feb 4, 2017* St. Petersburg WTA 500 QF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #5 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #16 Match data
Jul 7, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Elena Vesnina #50 6-2 6-2 Dominika Cibulkova #18 Match data
Oct 22, 2015* Moscow WTA 500 R32 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #33 7-5 6-1 Elena Vesnina #111 Match data
Oct 22, 2011* Moscow WTA 500 SF Hard Dominika Cibulkova #20 6-0 6-2 Elena Vesnina #64 Match data
Jun 28, 2009* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Elena Vesnina #37 7-5 4-6 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #13 Match data
Apr 11, 2009* Ponte Vedra Beach WTA 250 QF Clay Elena Vesnina #63 7-5 6-7(5) 6-3 Dominika Cibulkova #16 Match data
Feb 20, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 R16 Hard Elena Vesnina #75 4-6 6-1 4-0 (ret.) Dominika Cibulkova #18 Match data
Jul 30, 2008* Montreal WTA 1000 R64 Hard Dominika Cibulkova #31 6-1 6-1 Elena Vesnina #62 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,966 365 261 58.3% 0 0 1 5 2 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2008 34–25 57.6% #19 1,840 0 0
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,733 0 0
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,893 0 1
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0 2012 34–25 57.6% #15 1,810 0 2
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,738 0 3
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,721 0 4
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,757 0 4
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2 2018 27–18 60.0% #25 1,865 0 8
30 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3 2019 2–8 20.0% #315 1,764 0 8
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3
34 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3