H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC
Elena Vesnina holds a 1–0 lead over Ekaterina Ivanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elena Vesnina leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Vesnina won the 2011 Moscow round of 16 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | 6-3 6-4 | Ekaterina Ivanova | Match data | Oct 21, 2011* | R16 | Moscow | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | — | #13 | 3,320 | 1,855 | 265 | 262 | 50.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Ekaterina Ivanova | — | #136 | 464 | 1,507 | 10 | 17 | 37.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Elena Vesnina | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #141 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #54 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #156 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,611 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #16 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #18 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,685 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Elena Vesnina | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 2004 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2009 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2010 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 18 | 12 | 30 | 60.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 39.1% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 1 | 7 | 85.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 7 | 9 | 16 | 43.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20 | 17 | 37 | 54.1% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 159 | 161 | 320 | 49.7% | 71 | 73 | 144 | 49.3% | 33 | 24 | 57 | 57.9% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | Career | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Elena Vesnina | Ekaterina Ivanova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 2004 | 1485 | 94.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.06 | 2007 | 1477 | 93.9 | — | — | — | — | +32 | — | — | 22.2% | -2.00 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 2005 | 1512 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +11 | — | 53.6% | +0.79 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.6 | +0.78 | 2008 | 1480 | 97.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | 38.5% | -1.08 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–1 | — | +0.23 |
| 2006 | 1617 | 126.3 | -0.84 | -1.03 | 0.952 | 48.9% | -20 | -59 | -4 | 45.6% | -0.31 | 10–11 (48%) | 6–4 (60%) | 103.7 | -0.40 | 2009 | 1482 | 100.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +42 | — | 45.5% | -0.64 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.25 |
| 2007 | 1638 | 118.8 | -0.56 | -2.73 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -15 | -88 | +33 | 47.2% | -0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | +0.71 | 2010 | 1468 | 97.8 | — | — | — | — | +37 | — | — | 40.9% | -1.23 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–0 | — | +0.71 |
| 2008 | 1561 | 120.1 | -1.61 | -0.27 | 0.943 | 48.7% | +45 | -56 | +60 | 40.0% | -0.80 | 7–6 (54%) | 2–5 (29%) | 98.2 | +0.30 | 2011 | 1498 | 108.0 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 40.0% | -1.20 | 2–0 | — | — | +0.06 |
| 2009 | 1770 | 139.9 | +1.52 | +2.06 | 1.060 | 51.2% | -22 | -133 | -92 | 56.4% | +0.36 | 13–6 (68%) | 7–5 (58%) | 111.1 | -0.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 1723 | 133.4 | +1.99 | +0.53 | 1.050 | 50.9% | +23 | -115 | — | 51.5% | +0.16 | 4–9 (31%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.0 | +0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 1666 | 128.4 | -0.70 | +1.97 | 0.998 | 49.9% | -46 | +18 | — | 48.2% | +0.06 | 6–5 (55%) | 2–9 (18%) | 96.7 | -0.39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 1698 | 129.2 | +0.84 | +0.09 | 0.961 | 49.2% | -74 | +10 | -44 | 45.3% | -0.45 | 1–3 (25%) | 3–1 (75%) | 98.7 | -2.97 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 1803 | 146.0 | +1.77 | +2.37 | 1.059 | 51.3% | -28 | -167 | -11 | 56.8% | +0.55 | 12–5 (71%) | 5–3 (63%) | 108.9 | -2.82 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 1691 | 123.1 | -1.11 | -0.16 | 0.953 | 49.1% | +10 | -36 | +78 | 48.7% | -0.21 | 7–5 (58%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.7 | +0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 1612 | 121.6 | -0.23 | -1.00 | 0.974 | 49.4% | +14 | +26 | — | 41.5% | -0.49 | 4–5 (44%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.4 | -1.02 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 1768 | 136.6 | +1.65 | +2.12 | 1.053 | 51.1% | -87 | -6 | +106 | 58.0% | +0.37 | 8–4 (67%) | 6–6 (50%) | 105.9 | -0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 1703 | 142.6 | +0.47 | +0.66 | 1.010 | 50.2% | +15 | +11 | +176 | 50.0% | +0.24 | 9–6 (60%) | 2–8 (20%) | 98.6 | +1.55 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 1686 | 126.4 | -0.27 | -0.49 | 0.954 | 49.3% | +7 | -3 | — | 44.2% | -0.49 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–2 (60%) | 99.3 | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1683 | 111.9 | +1.14 | +0.26 | 1.014 | 49.6% | — | -35 | — | 40.0% | -0.40 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1856 | 137.1 | +0.46 | +0.62 | 1.000 | 50.0% | -12 | -44 | +32 | 49.6% | -0.02 | 90–75 (55%) | 52–64 (45%) | 102.5 | -0.63 | Career | 1508 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | +35 | +46 | — | 38.5% | -1.20 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–1 (75%) | 104.8 | +5.48 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shuai Peng | 5 | 5 | 10 | Feb 21, 2018 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 2 | 8 | 10 | Aug 17, 2017 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 4 | 5 | 9 | Jan 11, 2018 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 0 | 8 | 8 | Jul 6, 2017 | H2H |
| Alizé Cornet | 3 | 5 | 8 | Feb 3, 2017 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 21, 2011 | H2H |
| Jelena Jankovic | 1 | 0 | 1 | Oct 20, 2011 | H2H |
| Marion Bartoli | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mar 4, 2011 | H2H |
| Nina Bratchikova | 1 | 0 | 1 | Mar 3, 2011 | H2H |
| Monica Niculescu | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 24, 2010 | H2H |