H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Vesnina vs Greta Arn H2H: 0-1
Greta Arn holds a 1–0 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Greta Arn leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Greta Arn won the 2011 Rome fourth round 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2011* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R16 | Clay | Greta Arn | 3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | Elena Vesnina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Greta Arn | #448 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,695 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Vesnina | Greta Arn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #91 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #162 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #235 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #88 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #63 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #114 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #406 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |