H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Elena Vesnina vs Olga Savchuk H2H: 2-0
Elena Vesnina holds a 2–0 lead over Olga Savchuk in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Elena Vesnina leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Elena Vesnina won the 2010 Tashkent fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 39
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 38
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2010* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 6-2 6-2 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2006* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Elena Vesnina | 5-7 6-2 6-4 | Olga Savchuk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Vesnina | #573 | #13 | 3,320 | 1,858 | 262 | 260 | 50.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Olga Savchuk | #906 | #79 | 588 | 1,597 | 36 | 77 | 31.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elena Vesnina | Olga Savchuk | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #285 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #106 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #102 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #47 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #54 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #79 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #23 | 1,767 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #150 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2010 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #195 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #57 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,426 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2012 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2013 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #25 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,418 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #64 | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #196 | 1,436 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2015 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #115 | 1,609 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #309 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2016 | 28–16 | 63.6% | #16 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #18 | 1,691 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #137 | 1,679 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2021 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #310 | 1,689 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |