H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-5

Serena Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2016 Wimbledon semifinal 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 9, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam SF Grass Serena Williams #1 6-2 6-0 Elena Vesnina #50 Match data
Oct 2, 2013* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Serena Williams #1 6-4 6-2 Elena Vesnina #24 Match data
May 9, 2012* Madrid WTA 1000 R64 Clay Serena Williams #9 6-3 6-1 Elena Vesnina #68 Match data
Apr 5, 2012* Charleston WTA 500 R32 Clay Serena Williams #10 6-3 6-4 Elena Vesnina #56 Match data
Aug 28, 2008* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #3 6-1 6-1 Elena Vesnina #71 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71