H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Elena Vesnina vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 3-4

Virginie Razzano holds a 4–3 lead over Elena Vesnina in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Virginie Razzano leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2016 Strasbourg quarterfinal 6-1 3-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Elena Vesnina
RUS Age 39 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Virginie Razzano
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 20, 2016* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Virginie Razzano #186 6-1 3-6 6-1 Elena Vesnina #47 Match data
May 23, 2015* Strasbourg WTA 500 QF Clay Virginie Razzano #251 4-6 6-1 6-1 Elena Vesnina #95 Match data
Jan 19, 2011* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Virginie Razzano #100 4-6 6-3 6-3 Elena Vesnina #53 Match data
May 14, 2009* Madrid WTA 1000 R32 Clay Elena Vesnina #52 7-5 6-3 Virginie Razzano #34 Match data
Aug 25, 2007* Forest Hills WTA 250 SF Hard Virginie Razzano #36 6-2 6-0 Elena Vesnina #58 Match data
Jun 14, 2006* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Elena Vesnina #63 6-3 3-6 6-0 Virginie Razzano #83 Match data
Apr 5, 2006* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Elena Vesnina #67 7-5 3-6 6-3 Virginie Razzano #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Elena Vesnina #573 #13 3,320 1,858 262 260 50.2% 0 1 0 1 1 3
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Elena Vesnina Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2004 0–1 0.0% #259 1,485 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2005 6–6 50.0% #106 1,511 0 0 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2006 20–24 45.5% #47 1,617 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2007 17–21 44.7% #54 1,631 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2008 12–19 38.7% #79 1,558 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2009 31–20 60.8% #23 1,767 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2010 22–22 50.0% #52 1,720 0 0 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2011 19–21 47.5% #57 1,689 0 0 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2012 14–17 45.2% #68 1,701 0 0 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2013 30–19 61.2% #25 1,801 0 2 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2014 16–17 48.5% #64 1,689 0 2 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2015 11–17 39.3% #115 1,609 0 2 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2016 28–16 63.6% #16 1,778 0 2 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2017 25–26 49.0% #18 1,691 0 3 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2018 8–11 42.1% #137 1,679 0 3 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2021 3–3 50.0% #310 1,689 0 3 — — — — — — —