H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 0-2
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–0 lead over Eleni Daniilidou in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2006 Auckland third round 7-5 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2006* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Sep 24, 2005* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-2 6-2 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Katarina Srebotnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |