H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 2-2
Eleni Daniilidou and Meghann Shaughnessy are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2006 Canberra third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 2006* | Canberra | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-3 6-3 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Apr 13, 2005* | Charleston | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-4 6-0 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
| Oct 2, 2003* | Moscow | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Eleni Daniilidou | 7-5 6-3 | Meghann Shaughnessy | Match data |
| Mar 8, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Meghann Shaughnessy | 6-4 6-3 | Eleni Daniilidou | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Meghann Shaughnessy | #1,104 | #11 | 1,949 | 1,888 | 233 | 233 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Meghann Shaughnessy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #165 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #99 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #38 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #12 | 1,825 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 29–27 | 51.8% | #30 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,725 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #40 | 1,663 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #37 | 1,709 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #52 | 1,666 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | 2008 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #836 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | 2009 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #590 | 1,533 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |