H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 1-0
Eleni Daniilidou holds a 1–0 lead over Miriam Oremans in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2002 Wimbledon third round 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 53
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Eleni Daniilidou | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Miriam Oremans | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Miriam Oremans | #193 | #25 | 585 | 1,809 | 161 | 181 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Miriam Oremans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #31 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #48 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #42 | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #46 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #57 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #64 | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #124 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |