H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Eleni Daniilidou vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 2-0
Eleni Daniilidou holds a 2–0 lead over Tatiana Panova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eleni Daniilidou leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eleni Daniilidou won the 2002 Birmingham third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GRE
Age 43
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
154 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2002* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-4 6-2 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2002* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Eleni Daniilidou | 6-2 4-6 6-0 | Tatiana Panova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eleni Daniilidou | #1,070 | #14 | 1,639 | 1,878 | 185 | 203 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Tatiana Panova | #1,113 | #20 | 1,270 | 1,782 | 130 | 196 | 39.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eleni Daniilidou | Tatiana Panova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #81 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #179 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,778 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,706 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #97 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #34 | 1,683 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #78 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #69 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #40 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #36 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 23–28 | 45.1% | #34 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #40 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2008 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,700 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 34–31 | 52.3% | #23 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #157 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #114 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #165 | 1,666 | 0 | 5 | 2004 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,566 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #91 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #100 | 1,483 | 0 | 5 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2013 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #186 | 1,431 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,412 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |