H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Elisabeth Ekblom vs Leslie Allen H2H: 1-0
Elisabeth Ekblom holds a 1–0 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Elisabeth Ekblom leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elisabeth Ekblom won the 1980 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1980* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elisabeth Ekblom | 6-3 6-7 6-3 | Leslie Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabeth Ekblom | — | — | — | 1,597 | 40 | 63 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leslie Allen | — | — | — | 1,911 | 87 | 121 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabeth Ekblom | Leslie Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1973 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1976 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1978 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,540 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1979 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1980 | 4–11 | 26.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1981 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1982 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1983 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 1 |