H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Elisabetta Cocciaretto vs Camila Osorio H2H: 2-1
Elisabetta Cocciaretto holds a 2–1 lead over Camila Osorio in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Camila Osorio leads 1–0 on clay, while Elisabetta Cocciaretto leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Elisabetta Cocciaretto won the 2025 Jiujiang third round 6-2 3-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 25
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
COL
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2025 | Jiujiang | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Camila Osorio | Match data |
| May 19, 2025 | Rabat | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Camila Osorio | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Match data |
| Jul 5, 2023* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | 6-3 6-4 | Camila Osorio | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elisabetta Cocciaretto | #68 | #29 | 1,420 | 1,843 | 79 | 90 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Camila Osorio | #53 | #33 | 1,354 | 1,825 | 100 | 89 | 52.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | Camila Osorio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #477 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #207 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2020 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #132 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #55 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2021 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #156 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #80 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #64 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2023 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 2024 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #52 | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | 2025 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #77 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2025 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #83 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2026 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #53 | 1,793 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2026 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #68 | 1,753 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |