H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Elise Burgin vs Louise Allen H2H: 4-1
Elise Burgin holds a 4–1 lead over Louise Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Elise Burgin leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Louise Allen won the 1992 Birmingham second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1992* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Louise Allen | 6-4 6-4 | Elise Burgin | Match data |
| Feb 8, 1990* | Wichita | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 3-6 7-6 7-6 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Sep 14, 1989* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Sep 16, 1988* | Phoenix | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Elise Burgin | 1-6 6-3 6-4 | Louise Allen | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1983* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Elise Burgin | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | Louise Allen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elise Burgin | #768 | #27 | 20 | 1,845 | 132 | 165 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Louise Allen | — | — | — | 1,759 | 67 | 100 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Elise Burgin | Louise Allen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1981 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 1,737 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1983 | 13–9 | 59.1% | — | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1984 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #51 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #52 | 1,772 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1986 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #40 | 1,776 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1987 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #66 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1988 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1990 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #149 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #299 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–8 | 20.0% | — | 1,453 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1992 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #166 | 1,524 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #400 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |