H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emiko Okagawa vs Julie Richardson H2H: 1-0
Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Julie Richardson in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1987 Singapore fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 61
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
NZL
Age 59
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 1987* | Singapore | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Emiko Okagawa | 6-2 6-4 | Julie Richardson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Julie Richardson | #643 | #102 | 9 | 1,575 | 28 | 65 | 30.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Julie Richardson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #162 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #157 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #103 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #257 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #137 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #556 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #157 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #301 | 1,411 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #367 | 1,400 | 0 | 0 |