H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Emiko Okagawa vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-0
Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1985 Houston third round 1-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1985* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Emiko Okagawa | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Pam Casale | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emiko Okagawa | — | — | — | 1,523 | 18 | 39 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emiko Okagawa | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,436 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,447 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |