H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emiko Okagawa vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-0

Emiko Okagawa holds a 1–0 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emiko Okagawa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emiko Okagawa won the 1985 Houston round of 32 1-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiko Okagawa
JPN Age 61
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emiko Okagawa 1-6 6-1 6-3 Pam Casale Match data May 2, 1985* R32 Houston WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emiko Okagawa — — — 1,523 18 39 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiko Okagawa Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 1–2 33.3% — 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 0 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,480 0 0 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1983 0–2 0.0% — 1,454 0 0 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1984 5–6 45.5% — 1,473 0 0 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1985 1–8 11.1% — 1,437 0 0 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1986 3–5 37.5% — 1,458 0 0 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1987 4–6 40.0% — 1,487 0 0 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1988 3–4 42.9% — 1,488 0 0 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,474 0 0 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,458 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1992 0–1 0.0% — 1,447 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiko Okagawa Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1984 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1985 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1987 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 12 22 34 35.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiko Okagawa Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 42.9% -1.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1981 1476 100.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.02 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1982 1481 93.6 — — — — +51 — — 28.6% -1.72 1–0 — — -0.03 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1983 1454 93.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.41 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1984 1474 103.8 — — — — +63 +71 — 50.0% -0.31 1–3 (25%) 2–0 — +1.75 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1985 1437 95.8 — — — — +60 +70 — 15.0% -2.70 1–1 1–1 — -0.01 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1986 1458 103.7 — — — — +45 — — 45.0% -0.20 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.89 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1987 1487 97.6 — — — — +53 — — 38.1% -1.48 1–0 5–0 (100%) — +1.14 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1988 1489 93.8 — — — — +24 — — 42.9% -1.21 — 1–0 — +1.03 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1990 1474 94.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1991 1458 97.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.00 0–1 — — +0.22 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1992 1447 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1524 94.4 — — — — +49 +71 — 35.2% -1.34 5–9 (36%) 10–3 (77%) 103.8 +10.25 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.