H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emiliana Arango vs Petra Martic H2H: 0-1

Petra Martic holds a 1–0 lead over Emiliana Arango in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Petra Martic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Martic won the 2024 Palermo first round 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emiliana Arango
Colombia Age 25 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Petra Martic
Croatia Age 35 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Petra Martic #99 6-2 6-3 Emiliana Arango #120 Match data Jul 18, 2024* R32 Palermo WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emiliana Arango #88 #46 1,229 1,700 31 48 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Petra Martic #349 #14 2,850 1,938 212 215 49.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emiliana Arango Petra Martic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2016 0–1 0.0% #825 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2017 0–1 0.0% #502 1,467 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #330 1,480 0 0
17 2018 2–1 66.7% #405 1,489 0 0 2008 2–1 66.7% #215 1,505 0 0
18 2019 0–1 0.0% #545 1,476 0 0 2009 6–7 46.2% #82 1,538 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 2010 5–14 26.3% #142 1,516 0 0
20 2021 0–1 0.0% #240 1,480 0 0 2011 16–14 53.3% #50 1,621 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2012 18–18 50.0% #59 1,691 0 0
22 2023 7–4 63.6% #116 1,625 0 0 2013 7–12 36.8% #107 1,607 0 0
23 2024 3–7 30.0% #169 1,554 0 0 2014 1–8 11.1% #186 1,515 0 0
24 2025 11–15 42.3% #49 1,649 0 0 2015 0–8 0.0% #148 1,435 0 0
25 2026 8–17 32.0% #88 1,605 0 0 2016 3–3 50.0% #262 1,525 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2017 6–4 60.0% #89 1,613 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2018 26–17 60.5% #32 1,798 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2019 36–17 67.9% #15 1,901 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2020 14–11 56.0% #18 1,804 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2021 15–21 41.7% #54 1,656 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2022 25–17 59.5% #38 1,796 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2023 20–19 51.3% #40 1,806 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2024 9–19 32.1% #122 1,635 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2025 3–4 42.9% #209 1,606 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emiliana Arango Petra Martic
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2017 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2018 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2021 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 11 9 20 55.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 12 12 24 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 2023 6 3 9 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 1 6 7 14.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
23 2024 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2025 9 10 19 47.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2026 2 10 12 16.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 18 10 28 64.3% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 12 26 53.8% 16 3 19 84.2% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 8 7 15 53.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 7 13 20 35.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 13 25 48.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 5 11 16 31.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 19 26 45 42.2% 11 18 29 37.9% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — 109 129 238 45.8% 77 63 140 55.0% 24 21 45 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/80 of Emiliana Arango's and 406/427 of Petra Martic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emiliana Arango Petra Martic
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2016 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.0% 52.4% 7.1% 28.6% 0.0% 34.3% 27.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2017 1/1 1.0 3.0 66.7% 44.1% 29.4% 14.3% 22.2% 39.2% 42.9% 2007 1/1 4.0 3.0 51.0% 75.5% 55.3% 50.0% 33.3% 65.6% 38.4%
17 2018 3/3 0.3 2.0 75.5% 53.0% 33.5% 51.5% 50.7% 48.2% 48.3% 2008 2/3 3.0 5.5 66.8% 69.2% 33.8% 56.3% 66.7% 57.6% 48.6%
18 2019 1/1 1.0 1.0 59.3% 51.4% 37.5% 60.0% 33.3% 45.8% 44.1% 2009 12/13 2.0 3.0 60.5% 63.9% 45.2% 60.5% 50.2% 57.0% 40.2%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 18/19 2.4 4.3 62.9% 60.8% 45.8% 55.5% 38.6% 55.0% 37.5%
20 2021 1/1 1.0 11.0 64.3% 63.9% 40.0% 70.0% 45.5% 55.4% 41.2% 2011 27/30 3.8 5.3 56.2% 64.5% 47.1% 50.8% 38.7% 56.7% 41.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 35/36 4.6 4.3 57.8% 65.0% 45.4% 53.3% 48.4% 56.5% 40.2%
22 2023 11/11 0.8 3.5 66.9% 61.5% 45.0% 51.3% 47.8% 56.4% 47.0% 2013 16/19 4.2 5.4 60.1% 62.7% 45.0% 52.2% 33.9% 55.5% 40.1%
23 2024 10/10 0.7 3.8 71.8% 57.6% 37.9% 49.6% 46.4% 51.3% 43.1% 2014 7/9 3.7 4.0 53.2% 61.9% 39.2% 50.3% 47.2% 51.5% 35.3%
24 2025 25/26 0.8 2.8 70.4% 55.3% 43.3% 52.9% 48.4% 52.2% 46.9% 2015 6/8 4.2 5.3 56.0% 64.0% 40.8% 47.3% 50.6% 54.3% 30.8%
25 2026 25/26 0.8 2.2 69.3% 56.5% 44.9% 45.8% 39.5% 52.9% 43.4% 2016 6/6 4.0 4.7 66.0% 62.8% 47.5% 57.2% 40.4% 57.6% 39.3%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 10/10 3.4 2.7 68.9% 66.1% 50.3% 55.1% 51.5% 61.0% 45.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 43/43 3.2 2.2 62.8% 66.7% 48.8% 56.4% 43.9% 60.2% 42.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 52/53 2.6 2.7 64.0% 66.8% 49.8% 59.9% 49.1% 60.7% 44.2%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 25/25 3.2 2.6 61.7% 65.2% 50.7% 64.0% 39.1% 59.6% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 36/36 3.8 2.8 58.8% 66.3% 46.7% 51.1% 43.6% 58.1% 39.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 42/42 4.5 3.3 60.1% 67.7% 49.2% 48.0% 43.3% 60.1% 40.9%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 38/39 4.8 3.4 57.1% 68.6% 47.9% 56.2% 40.1% 60.0% 39.8%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 27/28 4.4 3.5 58.8% 67.3% 42.8% 47.6% 49.7% 57.1% 37.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 3/7 1.7 3.7 62.1% 57.5% 38.4% 45.6% 35.6% 50.5% 41.2%
Career — 78/80 0.8 2.9 69.5% 56.6% 42.2% 49.4% 44.1% 52.3% 44.9% — 406/427 3.7 3.4 60.3% 65.9% 47.2% 54.3% 44.1% 58.4% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emiliana Arango Petra Martic
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2016 1484 91.5 -2.51 -2.53 0.418 30.7% — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2017 1467 96.4 -3.60 -2.70 0.705 41.2% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.20 2007 1480 97.4 -1.36 -1.85 1.117 51.0% — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–1 0–1 — +0.22
17 2018 1489 104.7 -1.46 -1.18 0.932 48.2% — +44 — 80.0% +2.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.47 2008 1506 104.8 -0.42 +0.18 1.145 53.2% +19 — — 62.5% +0.63 1–1 1–0 — +0.27
18 2019 1476 97.0 -0.98 -4.22 0.813 44.9% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 2009 1539 112.1 +0.24 -2.39 0.933 48.5% +1 +22 — 50.0% -0.21 0–2 2–1 (67%) — +0.36
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1517 116.5 -0.78 -3.50 0.832 46.5% +35 -37 — 31.8% -1.23 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 102.7 -0.85
20 2021 1481 98.2 -1.16 -3.38 0.922 48.6% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.03 2011 1622 125.1 +0.45 -1.86 0.961 48.9% +17 -104 — 51.4% +0.07 10–4 (71%) 4–0 (100%) 111.1 +0.97
21 2022 1499 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1692 131.0 +0.67 -2.20 0.926 48.6% -8 -98 — 48.8% -0.17 8–4 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 104.8 -1.21
22 2023 1626 117.4 -0.01 +1.49 1.077 51.4% -16 — — 59.1% +0.50 1–1 1–0 — +0.79 2013 1607 115.3 -1.25 -2.67 0.900 48.0% -10 -6 +18 41.9% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 -0.05
23 2024 1555 108.1 -4.13 -1.19 0.885 47.0% -2 +55 — 34.8% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.11 2014 1516 93.7 -1.25 -4.62 0.729 43.8% +28 — — 17.6% -2.53 0–1 1–1 — +0.24
24 2025 1650 129.6 -2.84 +2.08 0.982 49.5% +14 -55 — 39.7% -0.44 5–2 (71%) 1–2 (33%) 103.1 +0.66 2015 1435 105.3 -1.11 -3.28 0.673 43.0% +70 +50 — 0.0% -3.06 — — — -0.11
25 2026 1605 118.3 -3.27 +0.13 0.921 48.1% -12 -26 -66 37.9% -0.91 2–6 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 98.2 +0.49 2016 1525 114.6 -0.08 -2.76 0.925 48.4% — +9 — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — -0.05
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1613 126.9 +3.55 +1.52 1.162 53.0% — +3 +54 60.0% +0.96 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.03
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1798 139.6 +3.00 +0.36 1.076 51.1% -18 -100 -125 58.3% +0.55 8–4 (67%) 6–4 (60%) 106.6 -0.04
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1901 146.2 +3.96 +1.65 1.124 52.4% -93 +30 -139 58.5% +0.79 15–3 (83%) 4–6 (40%) 110.1 -0.27
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1805 132.1 +1.70 -1.09 1.032 50.6% -35 +79 — 56.7% +0.28 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 98.0 +1.15
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1657 123.5 +1.00 -2.75 0.932 48.5% -33 +198 +99 43.7% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 4–8 (33%) 94.0 +2.13
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1796 134.2 +2.70 -0.72 1.026 50.4% -88 +143 -60 56.3% +0.31 8–4 (67%) 10–5 (67%) 107.9 +0.20
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1807 141.5 +3.00 -1.92 0.994 49.7% -62 +90 +3 47.1% -0.20 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 103.2 -0.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1636 121.5 +0.25 -3.87 0.883 47.5% -6 +131 +180 35.4% -0.94 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 97.0 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1607 111.0 -0.30 -0.75 0.832 45.5% -40 +116 — 47.4% -0.53 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.57
Career — 1701 121.1 -2.65 +0.56 0.942 48.5% -1 -10 -66 40.6% -0.64 10–12 (45%) 7–6 (54%) 101.7 +3.42 — 1938 136.0 +1.65 -1.36 0.980 49.5% -28 +38 -14 48.7% -0.08 86–63 (58%) 58–54 (52%) 109.3 +0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.