H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Anca Barna H2H: 1-0

Emilie Loit holds a 1–0 lead over Anca Barna in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2004 Forest Hills round of 16 5-7 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Anca Barna
GER Age 49 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #39 5-7 6-2 6-4 Anca Barna #53 Match data Aug 28, 2004* R16 Forest Hills Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Anca Barna #1,120 #46 747 1,687 68 106 39.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Anca Barna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #221 1,496 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #303 1,485 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 1999 3–7 30.0% #118 1,446 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2000 3–5 37.5% #137 1,458 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2001 4–12 25.0% #116 1,450 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 2002 15–21 41.7% #62 1,524 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 2003 24–25 49.0% #48 1,659 0 0
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2004 16–28 36.4% #84 1,539 0 0
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 2005 3–6 33.3% #338 1,514 0 0
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Anca Barna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 3 7 10 30.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 15 12 27 55.6% 7 10 17 41.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 36 50 86 41.9% 26 41 67 38.8% 4 8 12 33.3% 2 7 9 22.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 9/102 of Anca Barna's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Anca Barna
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% 2003 4/49 1.3 6.8 63.3% 54.7% 35.2% 40.6% 44.6% 46.7% 42.4%
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% 2004 4/44 1.3 2.5 63.9% 55.3% 45.9% 52.1% 50.6% 51.7% 40.1%
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% 2005 1/9 3.0 2.0 74.1% 57.5% 42.9% 28.6% 100.0% 53.7% 32.6%
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% — 9/174 1.4 4.3 64.8% 55.3% 40.8% 44.4% 53.4% 49.7% 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Anca Barna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1496 107.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.27
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 1997 1486 101.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.01
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 1999 1446 100.8 — — — — +51 +59 — 26.3% -1.47 0–1 1–1 — +0.67
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 2000 1458 104.9 — — — — +43 +46 — 42.1% -0.95 1–2 (33%) — — +0.44
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 2001 1451 111.4 — — — — +24 +18 — 27.8% -1.67 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.17
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 2002 1525 123.4 — — — — -43 +33 — 42.4% -0.41 7–6 (54%) 6–1 (86%) 107.1 +0.34
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 2003 1660 132.9 -2.52 -0.36 0.797 44.7% -19 -63 -105 49.6% +0.13 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 102.0 -1.31
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2004 1539 109.6 -1.15 -1.61 0.830 46.1% -3 -7 -30 37.9% -0.94 8–7 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 101.7 -0.14
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 2005 1514 101.0 -0.37 -1.56 0.703 44.3% +2 — — 23.5% -1.82 1–0 0–1 — +0.16
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1687 121.3 -1.67 -1.05 0.801 45.3% -8 +5 -58 40.1% -0.65 27–28 (49%) 17–14 (55%) 104.3 -0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.