H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Ashley Harkleroad H2H: 0-3

Ashley Harkleroad holds a 3–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Ashley Harkleroad leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ashley Harkleroad won the 2008 ASB Classic round of 32 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Ashley Harkleroad
USA Age 41 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ashley Harkleroad #67 6-4 6-1 Emilie Loit #43 Match data Jan 3, 2008* R32 ASB Classic Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Ashley Harkleroad #58 6-1 6-4 Emilie Loit #45 Match data May 24, 2003* QF Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Ashley Harkleroad #101 6-3 2-4 (ret.) Emilie Loit #51 Match data Apr 9, 2003* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Ashley Harkleroad #1,051 #39 821 1,681 51 79 39.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Ashley Harkleroad
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #277 1,479 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2002 3–5 37.5% #113 1,501 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 2003 14–14 50.0% #52 1,592 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 2004 8–12 40.0% #123 1,581 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 2005 0–4 0.0% #118 1,528 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 2006 9–15 37.5% #86 1,550 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 2007 7–14 33.3% #67 1,512 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2008 10–11 47.6% #133 1,570 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 2010 0–2 0.0% #1020 1,551 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Ashley Harkleroad
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 5 7 12 41.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 35 52 87 40.2% 14 19 33 42.4% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 65/120 of Ashley Harkleroad's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Ashley Harkleroad
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 6/28 1.0 2.2 71.5% 58.8% 40.9% 55.5% 33.7% 53.6% 44.8%
19 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 3/20 1.0 2.7 73.5% 51.7% 34.3% 37.5% 84.8% 47.2% 45.2%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 1/4 1.0 3.0 57.1% 25.0% 11.1% 33.3% — 19.0% 27.6%
21 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 15/24 1.3 3.1 66.1% 60.3% 42.4% 48.5% 43.6% 54.0% 40.0%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 20/21 0.6 3.1 71.1% 56.9% 42.2% 50.3% 43.1% 52.5% 43.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 19/21 0.8 3.4 68.3% 57.6% 42.7% 48.2% 45.4% 52.9% 44.6%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% 2010 1/2 0.0 2.0 72.5% 48.6% 42.9% 44.4% 50.0% 47.1% 31.9%
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% — 65/130 0.9 3.1 69.1% 57.2% 41.5% 48.8% 44.4% 52.2% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Ashley Harkleroad
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1479 102.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 — — -0.03
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1502 120.5 — — — — +25 — — 37.5% -0.50 — 1–1 — -0.26
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 2003 1592 121.9 -0.82 +0.82 0.967 49.5% -59 +93 — 49.1% -0.04 1–6 (14%) 2–3 (40%) 94.4 +0.64
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 2004 1581 123.9 -1.88 -0.09 0.856 46.1% 0 +53 — 42.9% -0.62 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -0.37
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 2005 1529 99.7 -1.98 -1.34 0.341 24.0% +12 — — 25.0% -2.25 0–2 — — -0.09
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 2006 1550 119.5 -0.91 -2.27 0.871 47.1% +17 +27 — 41.5% -0.98 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 99.6 -0.70
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 2007 1513 111.3 -2.54 -1.08 0.912 48.0% +6 +48 — 37.2% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 98.6 +1.00
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 2008 1571 121.1 -2.19 +0.77 0.946 48.8% +20 — -60 48.9% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.8 -0.16
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 2010 1552 102.9 -1.56 +0.46 0.603 39.8% — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.09
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1681 124.5 -1.85 -0.57 0.895 47.5% +2 +64 -60 42.4% -0.63 7–21 (25%) 12–12 (50%) 92.7 -0.05

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.