H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Barbara Schwartz H2H: 1-0

Emilie Loit holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Schwartz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2002 Brussels quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-3.

FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
AUT Age 47 Left-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #59 4-6 7-5 6-3 Barbara Schwartz #77 Match data Jul 13, 2002* QF Brussels Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Barbara Schwartz #699 #40 732 1,644 35 54 39.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Barbara Schwartz
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1996 0–3 0.0% #209 1,463 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 1998 3–6 33.3% #118 1,473 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 1999 13–13 50.0% #42 1,638 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 2000 0–6 0.0% #748 1,543 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 2001 6–8 42.9% #90 1,582 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2002 10–11 47.6% #125 1,597 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2003 2–1 66.7% #183 1,626 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 2004 1–6 14.3% #311 1,541 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Barbara Schwartz
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1997 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2000 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 4 4 8 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 2 1 3 66.7%
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2009 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% 14 19 33 42.4% 16 25 41 39.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 4 7 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 1/7 of Barbara Schwartz's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Barbara Schwartz
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% —/—
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% 2004 1/7 0.0 4.0 53.7% 40.9% 26.3% 14.3% 25.0% 34.1% 39.2%
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% —/—
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% —/—
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% —/—
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% —/—
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% —/—
Career 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% 1/89 0.0 4.0 53.7% 40.9% 26.3% 14.3% 25.0% 34.1% 39.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Barbara Schwartz
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1996 1463 98.6 14.3% -1.57 0–1 +0.15
18 1997 1499 112.1 33.3% -1.67 0–1 -0.22
19 1998 1512 121.9 +45 +20 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 +0.24 1998 1474 108.8 +44 +37 36.8% -0.74 0–1 1–2 (33%) +0.21
20 1999 1424 101.4 +104 +28 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) +0.55 1999 1639 138.2 -34 -46 52.5% +0.41 4–5 (44%) 2–5 (29%) 100.5 -0.37
21 2000 1458 109.0 +67 +11 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 +0.50 2000 1544 95.5 +25 14.3% -2.72 0–2 0–1 +0.21
22 2001 1547 113.0 -32 -21 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 2001 1582 111.5 -12 -18 45.2% -0.45 3–2 (60%) 3–1 (75%) 104.4 +0.12
23 2002 1626 113.6 -91 +30 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 2002 1597 121.2 +10 -30 52.9% +0.18 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 97.2 -0.15
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 2003 1627 116.2 +14 57.1% +0.86 1–0 +0.01
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 2004 1542 96.5 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% -49 20.0% -1.87 0–1 0–1 -0.02
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 +0.07
Career 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 1644 123.6 -2.12 +0.06 0.595 37.0% -6 -29 -18 43.8% -0.32 12–19 (39%) 7–13 (35%) 96.6 +0.18

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.