H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Claudine Schaul H2H: 2-2

Emilie Loit and Claudine Schaul are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 2–1 on clay, while Claudine Schaul leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2005 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Claudine Schaul
LUX Age 43 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #92 6-3 6-0 Claudine Schaul #166 Match data May 25, 2005* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Emilie Loit #91 7-5 6-4 Claudine Schaul #77 Match data May 6, 2005* R16 Morocco Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Claudine Schaul #61 7-5 6-4 Emilie Loit #46 Match data Jan 13, 2005* R32 Canberra Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Claudine Schaul #66 6-4 6-1 Emilie Loit #32 Match data May 22, 2004* SF Strasbourg Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Claudine Schaul #1,188 #41 767 1,675 27 49 35.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Claudine Schaul
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #339 1,510 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2001 0–2 0.0% #260 1,486 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 2002 1–2 33.3% #133 1,500 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 2003 8–8 50.0% #80 1,590 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 2004 13–21 38.2% #61 1,552 0 1
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 2005 4–15 21.1% #174 1,467 0 1
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Claudine Schaul
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2004 6 13 19 31.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 2 7 9 22.2% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 16 29 45 35.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Claudine Schaul
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1510 105.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1486 95.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 2002 1501 106.4 — — — — +36 — — 0.0% -3.25 — — — -0.54
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 2003 1590 125.3 +0.67 +0.90 1.082 52.2% +11 — — 47.2% -0.08 3–1 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 104.7 -0.68
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 2004 1553 117.8 -0.10 -0.05 0.966 49.5% -49 +83 +26 40.0% -1.04 3–8 (27%) 5–2 (71%) 98.1 -0.41
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 2005 1468 102.3 -4.86 -0.99 0.642 38.4% -24 +119 +74 23.7% -1.97 1–1 0–2 — -0.42
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1675 117.0 -1.10 -0.05 0.886 47.4% -21 +97 +47 36.4% -1.15 7–11 (39%) 10–7 (59%) 101.2 -2.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.