H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 1-2
Joannette Kruger holds a 2–1 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Joannette Kruger leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2003 Acapulco third round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 52
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2003* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Emilie Loit | 6-3 6-0 | Joannette Kruger | Match data |
| Nov 18, 1999* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Joannette Kruger | 7-6 6-2 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1999* | Kuala Lumpur | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Joannette Kruger | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Joannette Kruger | #972 | #21 | 1,280 | 1,879 | 147 | 162 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilie Loit | Joannette Kruger | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #128 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #79 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #126 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,791 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #30 | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #129 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #59 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #46 | 1,643 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #455 | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #853 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |