H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Joannette Kruger H2H: 1-2

Joannette Kruger holds a 2–1 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Joannette Kruger leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2003 Acapulco round of 32 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Joannette Kruger
RSA Age 53 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #54 6-3 6-0 Joannette Kruger Match data Feb 27, 2003* R32 Acapulco Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Joannette Kruger #144 7-6 6-2 Emilie Loit #99 Match data Nov 18, 1999* R32 Pattaya Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Joannette Kruger #232 6-3 4-6 6-4 Emilie Loit #98 Match data Nov 11, 1999* R32 Kuala Lumpur Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Joannette Kruger #972 #21 1,280 1,860 147 163 47.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Joannette Kruger
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1992 2–3 40.0% #96 1,508 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 1993 9–13 40.9% #128 1,576 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 1994 13–17 43.3% #79 1,639 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 1995 19–15 55.9% #30 1,726 0 1
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 1996 7–13 35.0% #126 1,625 0 1
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 1997 25–18 58.1% #27 1,785 0 2
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 1998 25–22 53.2% #30 1,713 0 2
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 1999 9–13 40.9% #129 1,646 0 2
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 2000 16–17 48.5% #59 1,657 0 2
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2001 21–23 47.7% #46 1,643 0 2
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 2002 1–4 20.0% #455 1,591 0 2
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 2003 0–5 0.0% #853 1,531 0 2
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Joannette Kruger
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 2 7 9 22.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 10 7 17 58.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 4 6 10 40.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 4 3 7 57.1% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 18 11 29 62.1% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 6 4 10 60.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 16 12 28 57.1% 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 70 67 137 51.1% 62 64 126 49.2% 7 14 21 33.3% 8 18 26 30.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 1/5 of Joannette Kruger's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Joannette Kruger
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% 2003 1/5 0.0 5.0 68.1% 40.6% 13.3% 33.3% 75.0% 31.9% 45.8%
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% — 1/310 0.0 5.0 68.1% 40.6% 13.3% 33.3% 75.0% 31.9% 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Joannette Kruger
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1992 1508 108.6 — — — — — +78 — 41.7% -1.00 1–1 1–1 — 0.00
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 1993 1576 111.5 — — — — -64 +57 +8 38.5% -0.98 6–2 (75%) 2–4 (33%) 103.1 -0.32
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 1994 1640 139.3 — — — — -110 +86 -11 44.1% -0.47 4–6 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.9 -0.48
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 1995 1726 133.4 — — — — -64 +26 — 54.5% +0.18 5–4 (56%) 6–5 (55%) 101.5 +0.79
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 1996 1625 111.8 — — — — -5 +66 — 36.6% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 103.7 -0.38
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 1997 1786 143.0 — — — — -78 +29 — 53.0% +0.10 11–3 (79%) 6–4 (60%) 109.9 -0.97
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 1998 1714 137.8 — — — — +52 +7 — 50.0% -0.24 9–5 (64%) 4–6 (40%) 101.8 +0.70
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 1999 1647 113.5 — — — — +68 +11 — 39.6% -0.53 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 102.5 -0.09
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 2000 1658 124.8 — — — — +24 -4 — 50.0% -0.01 6–8 (43%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.73
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2001 1644 115.3 — — — — +38 -79 -127 44.1% -0.64 11–5 (69%) 6–7 (46%) 102.1 +0.58
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 2002 1591 105.0 — — — — +36 — — 30.8% -1.23 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.01
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 2003 1532 103.1 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% — -5 — 16.7% -2.50 0–2 — — -0.40
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1861 132.9 -1.38 +1.09 0.673 38.9% -3 +20 -33 46.1% -0.41 64–42 (60%) 39–40 (49%) 103.4 -0.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.