H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 0-2

Karina Habsudova holds a 2–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karina Habsudova leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 2000 Bratislava round of 32 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Karina Habsudova
SVK Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karina Habsudova #104 6-1 6-1 Emilie Loit #98 Match data Oct 26, 2000* R32 Bratislava Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Karina Habsudova #64 3-6 6-4 6-1 Emilie Loit #59 Match data Feb 25, 1999* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 172 174 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Karina Habsudova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 1996 38–22 63.3% #11 1,858 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,755 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,685 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,762 0 1
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 2000 14–20 41.2% #85 1,672 0 1
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,620 0 1
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Karina Habsudova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1994 7 5 12 58.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 18 9 27 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 7 8 15 46.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 10 8 18 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 81 74 155 52.3% 63 51 114 55.3% 5 14 19 26.3% 23 35 58 39.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Karina Habsudova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1536 111.6 — — — — +46 — — 71.4% +0.71 0–1 — — +0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1671 136.1 — — — — +23 -123 — 45.5% -0.32 6–2 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 109.6 -0.26
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1992 1663 140.8 — — — — +26 -85 — 41.5% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.32
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 1993 1628 125.7 — — — — +14 -50 — 46.8% -0.19 1–8 (11%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.06
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 1994 1796 152.2 — — — — -42 -99 — 54.2% +0.44 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 -1.38
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 1995 1732 138.3 — — — — -6 -18 — 54.1% +0.26 2–5 (29%) 3–0 (100%) 98.2 -0.36
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 1996 1858 158.9 — — — — -42 +41 — 59.1% +0.66 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 106.8 -1.42
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 1997 1756 144.1 — — — — +44 +38 -146 50.0% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.12
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 1998 1685 132.5 — — — — +56 +60 — 40.0% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 100.9 -2.04
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 1999 1763 138.7 — — — — -39 +74 -212 56.6% +0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.5 -1.31
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 2000 1673 123.7 — — — — +62 +17 — 42.7% -0.65 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -0.77
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2001 1621 107.3 — — — — +71 +3 — 37.8% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 -0.16
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1953 148.2 — — — — +10 +8 -174 49.9% -0.03 52–53 (50%) 33–27 (55%) 103.8 -2.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.