H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Katarina Srebotnik H2H: 1-4

Katarina Srebotnik holds a 4–1 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Katarina Srebotnik leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2008 Paris third round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Katarina Srebotnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 7, 2008* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Katarina Srebotnik #28 6-2 6-4 Emilie Loit #49 Match data
Sep 22, 2007* Portoroz WTA 250 QF Hard Katarina Srebotnik #24 6-3 6-3 Emilie Loit #42 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Katarina Srebotnik #43 6-1 3-6 6-3 Emilie Loit #49 Match data
May 7, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R64 Clay Emilie Loit #53 4-6 6-3 6-3 Katarina Srebotnik #40 Match data
Jun 2, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Katarina Srebotnik #48 6-0 6-1 Emilie Loit #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,780 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,845 224 204 52.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Katarina Srebotnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,511 0 0 2000 8–18 30.8% #120 1,484 0 1
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,512 0 1
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,456 0 0 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,727 0 2
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,548 0 0 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2004 13–18 41.9% #87 1,596 0 2
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,752 0 4
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,651 0 2 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,546 0 2 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,621 0 2 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,830 0 4
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,609 0 3 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,740 0 4
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,513 0 3 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,621 0 4
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,531 0 3 — — — — — — —