H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 3-2

Emilie Loit holds a 3–2 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 3–2 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2006 Estoril quarterfinal 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 6, 2006* Estoril WTA 250 QF Clay Emilie Loit #50 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #44 Match data
Feb 25, 2006* Bogota WTA 500 QF Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #89 7-6(6) 7-5 Emilie Loit #59 Match data
May 7, 2005* Rabat WTA 250 QF Clay Emilie Loit #91 6-4 7-5 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #128 Match data
Feb 27, 2004* Bogota WTA 250 R16 Clay Emilie Loit #46 7-6(2) 0-6 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #316 Match data
Feb 21, 2002* Bogota WTA 250 R32 Clay Lourdes Domínguez Lino #349 7-6(3) 7-6(5) Emilie Loit #111 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,780 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,511 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,456 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,548 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,651 0 2 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,546 0 2 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,621 0 2 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,609 0 3 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,513 0 3 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,531 0 3 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2