H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Magui Serna H2H: 1-4
Magui Serna holds a 4–1 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Magui Serna leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Magui Serna won the 2003 Indian Wells first round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Magui Serna | 6-4 6-3 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
| Feb 15, 2001* | Nice | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Magui Serna | 6-3 4-6 6-2 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Emilie Loit | 7-5 3-6 6-1 | Magui Serna | Match data |
| Jul 20, 2000* | Knokke-Heist | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Magui Serna | 6-0 7-6(5) | Emilie Loit | Match data |
| Aug 18, 1999* | Canadian Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Magui Serna | 6-3 6-0 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilie Loit | Magui Serna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |