H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Marta Marrero H2H: 4-0

Emilie Loit holds a 4–0 lead over Marta Marrero in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2004 Estoril semifinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
4 – 0
4 main draw meetings
Marta Marrero
ESP Age 43 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #33 6-4 6-4 Marta Marrero #95 Match data Apr 17, 2004* SF Estoril Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Emilie Loit #40 7-5 6-4 Marta Marrero #102 Match data Apr 10, 2004* QF Casablanca Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Emilie Loit #45 7-5 6-4 Marta Marrero #99 Match data Jan 21, 2004* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Emilie Loit #54 4-6 6-3 6-3 Marta Marrero #84 Match data Feb 28, 2003* R16 Acapulco Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Marta Marrero #727 #47 700 1,705 72 100 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Marta Marrero
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1999 2–2 50.0% #147 1,516 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2000 7–5 58.3% #70 1,599 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 2001 20–22 47.6% #61 1,618 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 2002 11–23 32.4% #87 1,547 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 2003 7–13 35.0% #98 1,498 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 2004 21–21 50.0% #49 1,573 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 2005 4–13 23.5% #285 1,499 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2007 0–1 0.0% #196 1,482 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Marta Marrero
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 12 12 24 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 8 10 18 44.4% 2 10 12 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 7 10 17 41.2% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2005 1 5 6 16.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 24 40 64 37.5% 45 50 95 47.4% 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Marta Marrero
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1517 98.9 — — — — — +32 — 40.0% -0.30 2–0 0–1 — +0.04
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1600 116.9 — — — — — +54 — 51.7% -0.21 4–1 (80%) 1–1 — -0.18
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 2001 1618 120.9 — — — — -77 +63 -14 47.9% -0.05 7–7 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.54
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 2002 1547 115.3 — — — — +12 +7 +32 38.2% -1.11 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) — -1.19
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 2003 1498 108.8 -2.63 -3.77 0.557 39.3% +36 +32 — 40.0% -0.73 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.54
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 2004 1573 123.2 -1.84 -1.25 0.828 45.9% -18 +107 -137 50.0% -0.15 7–7 (50%) 11–2 (85%) — +0.60
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.79 2005 1500 103.4 -1.95 -1.09 0.704 42.1% -5 +128 — 27.0% -1.81 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.11
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.57 2007 1483 96.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.10
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) — +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) — +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1705 119.0 -2.10 -1.97 0.720 43.1% -15 +67 -37 43.5% -0.56 25–28 (47%) 20–11 (65%) 107.9 -0.43

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.