H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Tauziat holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 1998 Paris fourth round 4-6 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 13, 1998* | Paris | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Nathalie Tauziat | 4-6 7-6 6-4 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilie Loit | Nathalie Tauziat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 |