H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Nicole Pratt H2H: 1-1

Emilie Loit and Nicole Pratt are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay, while Nicole Pratt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Pratt won the 2003 Miami first round 5-7 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Nicole Pratt
AUS Age 53 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 20, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Nicole Pratt #53 5-7 6-2 6-2 Emilie Loit #52 Match data
May 31, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Emilie Loit #158 6-3 6-2 Nicole Pratt #49 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,780 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 1 2 3
Nicole Pratt #1,043 #35 924 1,764 156 217 41.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Nicole Pratt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1990 1–1 50.0% #201 1,497 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1991 1–7 12.5% #201 1,469 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,511 0 0 1992 3–3 50.0% #203 1,491 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 1993 2–5 28.6% #172 1,486 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,456 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #224 1,465 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,548 0 0 1995 0–2 0.0% #214 1,451 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 1996 0–2 0.0% #194 1,434 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 1997 5–4 55.6% #110 1,494 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,651 0 2 1998 4–13 23.5% #113 1,464 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,546 0 2 1999 15–17 46.9% #56 1,598 0 0
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,621 0 2 2000 16–23 41.0% #54 1,621 0 0
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,609 0 3 2001 22–23 48.9% #51 1,704 0 0
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,513 0 3 2002 23–20 53.5% #48 1,719 0 0
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,531 0 3 2003 17–23 42.5% #53 1,646 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 19–21 47.5% #50 1,604 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 2005 8–17 32.0% #126 1,544 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 2006 8–12 40.0% #77 1,546 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 2007 10–16 38.5% #70 1,566 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2008 0–3 0.0% #1043 1,545 0 1