H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Petra Mandula H2H: 2-0

Emilie Loit holds a 2–0 lead over Petra Mandula in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2005 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Petra Mandula
HUN Age 48 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Emilie Loit #56 6-3 6-0 Petra Mandula #100 Match data Mar 8, 2005* R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Emilie Loit #54 3-6 6-2 6-1 Petra Mandula #82 Match data Mar 1, 2003* QF Acapulco Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Petra Mandula #417 #30 963 1,717 69 81 46.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Petra Mandula
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 1999 4–4 50.0% #109 1,515 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 2000 4–12 25.0% #156 1,465 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2001 10–9 52.6% #62 1,559 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2002 16–18 47.1% #90 1,580 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 2003 22–17 56.4% #40 1,692 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 2004 12–18 40.0% #81 1,602 0 0
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2005 1–3 25.0% #283 1,574 0 0
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Petra Mandula
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2000 1 6 7 14.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 8 8 16 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2005 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 22 43 65 33.8% 45 32 77 58.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 15/73 of Petra Mandula's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Petra Mandula
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% 2003 8/39 0.9 5.0 63.7% 62.9% 48.4% 52.6% 48.3% 57.9% 47.3%
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% 2004 5/30 1.2 8.0 57.9% 60.6% 42.9% 54.2% 59.4% 52.9% 48.9%
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% 2005 2/4 0.5 7.5 55.9% 60.7% 39.8% 52.3% 48.3% 51.4% 40.9%
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% — 15/150 0.9 6.3 60.7% 61.8% 45.4% 53.1% 52.0% 55.4% 47.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Petra Mandula
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 1999 1516 104.6 — — — — +4 +61 — 47.6% +0.10 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.52
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 2000 1466 102.3 — — — — +13 +83 — 33.3% -1.30 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.20
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 2001 1559 115.4 — — — — -112 +103 — 49.0% -0.25 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.22
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 2002 1580 116.5 — — — — -103 +119 — 48.7% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 7–3 (70%) 101.7 +0.73
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 2003 1693 129.7 +0.86 +1.55 1.124 52.5% -117 +76 — 57.8% +0.41 3–6 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.2 +0.21
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 2004 1602 126.8 -1.23 +1.53 1.037 50.8% -104 +175 — 43.5% -0.17 5–6 (45%) 4–6 (40%) 98.4 +1.08
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2005 1575 90.3 +0.39 -1.63 0.841 46.3% -91 — — 22.2% -2.67 1–0 — — +0.11
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1718 121.9 +0.10 +1.12 1.052 51.1% -90 +107 — 47.7% -0.26 24–28 (46%) 16–17 (48%) 101.3 +1.77

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.