H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 0-1
Shi-Ting Wang holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Shi-Ting Wang leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1999 Strasbourg third round 6-1 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 1999* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emilie Loit | Shi-Ting Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |