H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Tatiana Panova H2H: 0-1

Tatiana Panova holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tatiana Panova leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tatiana Panova won the 2004 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tatiana Panova
RUS Age 50 Right-Handed 154 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tatiana Panova #122 6-1 6-2 Emilie Loit #28 Match data Jun 23, 2004* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tatiana Panova #1,113 #20 1,270 1,782 130 196 39.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Tatiana Panova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–2 33.3% #142 1,508 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1995 1–6 14.3% #179 1,485 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 1996 2–2 50.0% #159 1,498 0 0
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 1997 3–10 23.1% #97 1,474 0 0
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 1998 7–18 28.0% #78 1,471 0 0
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 1999 14–23 37.8% #40 1,583 0 0
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2000 23–28 45.1% #34 1,677 0 0
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2001 22–30 42.3% #40 1,660 0 0
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 2002 34–31 52.3% #23 1,753 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 2003 7–13 35.0% #114 1,636 0 0
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2004 8–14 36.4% #77 1,596 0 0
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 2005 8–15 34.8% #91 1,519 0 0
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 2006 0–4 0.0% #376 1,469 0 0
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Tatiana Panova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 7 10 30.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1999 8 14 22 36.4% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 15 14 29 51.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2001 10 16 26 38.5% 6 7 13 46.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 23 19 42 54.8% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 4 10 14 28.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 78 109 187 41.7% 24 48 72 33.3% 14 18 32 43.8% 14 21 35 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 84/242 of Emilie Loit's and 12/49 of Tatiana Panova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emilie Loit Tatiana Panova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5% 2004 3/22 1.0 5.3 60.8% 51.6% 46.8% 48.3% 33.3% 49.8% 32.3%
28 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5% 2005 6/23 0.8 4.2 65.9% 55.3% 39.8% 45.9% 40.0% 50.4% 42.8%
29 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2% 2006 3/4 0.3 10.0 53.2% 50.6% 34.2% 49.0% 47.2% 43.0% 35.7%
30 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7% — 12/326 0.8 5.9 61.4% 53.2% 40.2% 47.3% 40.1% 48.4% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Tatiana Panova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1508 105.4 — — — — +37 — — 33.3% -1.67 — — — -0.36
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1995 1486 100.7 — — — — +8 — — 23.5% -2.41 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.67
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 1996 1498 103.8 — — — — +10 — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 0–2 — +0.45
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 1997 1475 115.4 — — — — +37 +88 — 30.0% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 3–4 (43%) 98.9 +0.03
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 1998 1472 113.4 — — — — +19 +31 +105 36.1% -1.28 3–8 (27%) 2–2 (50%) 96.6 -0.59
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 1999 1584 124.6 — — — — -26 -115 +13 45.3% -0.71 3–11 (21%) 7–6 (54%) 97.6 +0.99
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 2000 1677 127.2 — — — — +4 -238 -133 44.2% -0.41 6–4 (60%) 4–4 (50%) 103.1 +0.59
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 2001 1661 126.0 — — — — -34 -140 -4 44.0% -0.58 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 99.1 +2.56
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 2002 1753 142.0 — — — — -3 -148 -80 50.7% +0.03 13–11 (54%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 +0.43
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 2003 1637 117.1 — — — — +61 -104 — 35.4% -1.44 5–3 (63%) 2–1 (67%) 102.1 +0.47
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2004 1597 115.0 -1.24 -2.66 0.643 41.5% +18 — +112 37.8% -1.11 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 97.3 -0.34
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 2005 1520 110.7 -2.14 -1.30 0.863 46.4% +35 -39 +140 37.5% -0.77 5–5 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.0 +0.57
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 2006 1470 92.4 -3.36 -3.69 0.625 39.5% +28 — — 11.1% -3.33 0–1 — — +0.14
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1783 128.5 -2.22 -2.24 0.744 43.5% +3 -105 +13 42.0% -0.73 47–61 (44%) 34–39 (47%) 99.1 +1.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.