H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 1-1

Emilie Loit and Tina Pisnik are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tina Pisnik leads 1–0 on clay, while Emilie Loit leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2003 Italian Open round of 16 2-6 6-4 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Tina Pisnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tina Pisnik #65 2-6 6-4 6-1 Emilie Loit #52 Match data May 16, 2003* R16 Italian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Emilie Loit #58 6-0 7-6(0) Tina Pisnik #47 Match data Jan 2, 2003* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tina Pisnik #592 #29 1,046 1,720 91 119 43.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Tina Pisnik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #414 1,493 0 0
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 1999 11–9 55.0% #81 1,595 0 0
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 2000 10–16 38.5% #73 1,586 0 1
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 2001 16–17 48.5% #63 1,625 0 1
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 2002 23–24 48.9% #47 1,688 0 1
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 2003 23–27 46.0% #31 1,718 0 1
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 2004 8–23 25.8% #131 1,536 0 1
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 2005 0–2 0.0% #495 1,501 0 1
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 — — — — — — —
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 — — — — — — —
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 — — — — — — —
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Tina Pisnik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 5 5 10 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 2 7 9 22.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2001 9 10 19 47.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 14 15 29 48.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2003 7 13 20 35.0% 8 8 16 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 3 13 16 18.8% 2 6 8 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 40 63 103 38.8% 29 36 65 44.6% 15 15 30 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Tina Pisnik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1493 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.07
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 1999 1596 124.1 — — — — -4 +11 — 52.2% +0.17 6–2 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 105.1 +0.01
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 2000 1586 123.4 — — — — -30 +38 +7 44.4% -0.37 0–4 (0%) 4–6 (40%) 93.0 -0.32
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 2001 1626 120.7 — — — — -13 -18 +17 50.6% -0.25 7–10 (41%) 9–6 (60%) 99.3 +0.35
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 2002 1689 130.6 — — — — -18 -42 -52 48.0% -0.32 8–4 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 104.7 -2.20
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 2003 1719 131.1 +1.33 +1.11 1.083 51.5% -38 -38 -46 47.5% -0.01 10–10 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 -0.09
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 2004 1536 108.7 -2.55 -0.52 0.706 40.8% -6 +61 +85 37.1% -0.90 2–10 (17%) 2–1 (67%) 91.2 +0.80
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 2005 1502 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.16
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1721 127.5 +0.36 +0.70 0.962 48.8% -19 -5 -3 46.1% -0.32 33–40 (45%) 21–24 (47%) 96.1 -0.66

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.