H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emilie Loit vs Tzipora Obziler H2H: 0-1

Tzipora Obziler holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tzipora Obziler leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tzipora Obziler won the 2005 Australian Open first round 7-6(11) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tzipora Obziler
ISR Age 53 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tzipora Obziler #114 7-6(11) 6-4 Emilie Loit #47 Match data Jan 19, 2005* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Tzipora Obziler #316 #75 393 1,629 34 50 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emilie Loit Tzipora Obziler
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2 1998 0–1 0.0% #269 1,486 0 0
26 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2 2000 2–3 40.0% #193 1,485 0 0
28 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3 — — — — — — —
29 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3 2002 1–1 50.0% #146 1,489 0 0
30 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3 2003 2–3 40.0% #147 1,498 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2004 2–5 28.6% #111 1,488 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2005 5–7 41.7% #136 1,511 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2006 7–6 53.8% #112 1,587 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2007 12–11 52.2% #80 1,616 0 0
35 — — — — — — — 2008 3–12 20.0% #175 1,517 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #316 1,501 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emilie Loit Tzipora Obziler
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 11 7 18 61.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3% — 31 33 64 48.4% 3 14 17 17.6% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emilie Loit Tzipora Obziler
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06 1998 1486 96.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.05
26 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39 2000 1486 96.8 — — — — +56 — — 41.7% -1.08 1–1 — — +0.58
28 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27 2002 1490 99.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.20 0–1 — — +0.14
30 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07 2003 1499 109.4 — — — — +34 — — 50.0% +0.08 0–2 1–1 — -0.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1488 110.6 -0.17 -0.61 0.945 48.6% +39 — — 33.3% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.21
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1511 106.2 +0.96 -1.81 0.924 48.2% +31 — — 44.4% -0.56 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1587 126.6 -0.19 -0.25 0.896 47.0% +9 — — 59.4% +0.72 1–5 (17%) 1–0 — -0.37
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1617 112.4 -3.24 -4.08 0.780 45.1% +47 -180 — 48.1% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.6 +1.04
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1518 111.9 -2.36 -3.89 0.718 43.0% +90 -98 — 29.4% -1.47 0–4 (0%) — — -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1502 96.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.09
Career — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24 — 1630 116.0 -1.89 -2.96 0.804 45.4% +41 -134 — 44.1% -0.53 9–20 (31%) 8–4 (67%) 96.7 +1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.