H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emilie Loit vs Zi Yan H2H: 1-1
Emilie Loit and Zi Yan are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Emilie Loit won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 1-6 6-4 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
HKG
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Emilie Loit | 1-6 6-4 8-6 | Zi Yan | Match data |
| May 20, 2006* | Rabat | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Zi Yan | 1-6 7-6(6) 7-6(4) | Emilie Loit | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilie Loit | #161 | #27 | 1,016 | 1,780 | 162 | 180 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Zi Yan | #789 | #40 | 678 | 1,634 | 34 | 57 | 37.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Emilie Loit | Zi Yan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #243 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #101 | 1,424 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 1 |
| 2001 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #95 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #166 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 2002 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #58 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 2003 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #41 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,541 | 0 | 1 |
| 2004 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #45 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,498 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,546 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #422 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #56 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #43 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #137 | 1,513 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #161 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |