H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Dayana Yastremska H2H: 0-2
Dayana Yastremska holds a 2–0 lead over Emma Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dayana Yastremska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2025 Montreal third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 7-5 6-4 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Jan 20, 2024* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Dayana Yastremska | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 |