H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Emma Navarro vs Donna Vekic H2H: 0-3
Donna Vekic holds a 3–0 lead over Emma Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Donna Vekic leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2025 Madrid third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2025 | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Donna Vekic | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2025 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2023* | Monterrey | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 6-3 6-2 | Emma Navarro | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Navarro | #26 | #8 | 3,879 | 1,997 | 110 | 81 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Navarro | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #494 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #466 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #242 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2023 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #32 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2024 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #8 | 1,918 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #15 | 1,856 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #26 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |