H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Emma Navarro vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 0-1

Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Emma Navarro in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2019 Charleston Open first round 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Emma Navarro
United States Age 25 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Siegemund
Germany Age 38 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Siegemund #104 7-5 6-4 Emma Navarro #565 Match data Apr 3, 2019* R64 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Emma Navarro #27 #8 4,009 1,993 118 86 57.8% 0 0 0 2 1 3
Laura Siegemund #102 #27 1,630 1,852 145 154 48.5% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Emma Navarro Laura Siegemund
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2019 0–1 0.0% #494 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2020 0–1 0.0% #466 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2021 2–3 40.0% #242 1,481 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2022 1–3 25.0% #149 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2023 16–14 53.3% #32 1,735 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #220 1,483 0 0
23 2024 45–22 67.2% #8 1,914 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2025 30–24 55.6% #15 1,855 0 2 — — — — — — —
25 2026 24–18 57.1% #27 1,911 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — 2014 1–2 33.3% #136 1,495 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2015 5–7 41.7% #98 1,529 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2016 30–18 62.5% #31 1,747 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2017 13–12 52.0% #69 1,796 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2018 8–11 42.1% #113 1,693 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2019 15–20 42.9% #75 1,667 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2020 11–8 57.9% #51 1,789 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2021 8–14 36.4% #125 1,731 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2022 3–7 30.0% #177 1,655 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2023 13–11 54.2% #86 1,801 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2024 17–17 50.0% #80 1,739 0 2
37 — — — — — — — 2025 13–14 48.1% #46 1,803 0 2
38 — — — — — — — 2026 8–12 40.0% #102 1,748 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Emma Navarro Laura Siegemund
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2019 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2021 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2022 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2023 7 7 14 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2024 30 13 43 69.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2025 17 14 31 54.8% 6 6 12 50.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2026 10 12 22 45.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 11 9 20 55.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1 8 9 11.1% 12 4 16 75.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1 3 4 25.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 12 19 36.8% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 4 8 12 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1 5 6 16.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 12 9 21 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 11 9 20 55.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 8 8 16 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
Career — 64 50 114 56.1% 29 23 52 55.8% 25 13 38 65.8% — 66 83 149 44.3% 69 56 125 55.2% 10 15 25 40.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 186/204 of Emma Navarro's and 277/301 of Laura Siegemund's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Emma Navarro Laura Siegemund
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2019 1/1 0.0 1.0 55.4% 45.7% 40.5% 56.3% 41.7% 43.4% 46.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 1/1 1.0 7.0 59.8% 60.5% 43.1% 76.0% 27.3% 53.5% 40.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2021 5/5 1.2 3.6 60.6% 57.1% 41.1% 53.4% 50.9% 51.0% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2022 4/4 1.0 3.8 59.1% 50.9% 48.4% 44.7% 52.5% 50.3% 36.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2023 30/30 1.2 2.8 61.0% 61.9% 49.3% 48.2% 48.1% 56.9% 44.7% 2010 1/1 0.0 3.0 73.3% 33.3% 33.3% 12.5% 50.0% 33.3% 47.5%
23 2024 64/67 1.2 2.2 65.7% 64.7% 48.2% 52.2% 48.7% 59.3% 45.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2025 41/54 1.4 3.4 62.4% 63.6% 48.2% 55.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2026 40/42 4.4 4.0 58.0% 67.6% 45.9% 60.3% 43.5% 58.5% 43.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 3/3 3.3 8.0 63.6% 61.4% 44.0% 61.0% 54.8% 55.3% 49.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 8/12 0.8 2.6 70.8% 58.6% 50.3% 47.6% 51.3% 55.8% 47.8%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 43/48 1.0 2.7 71.0% 59.9% 46.9% 51.7% 50.6% 56.1% 46.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 24/25 1.1 4.5 69.0% 58.7% 42.8% 57.5% 45.1% 53.7% 46.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 19/20 1.1 3.9 66.0% 59.6% 47.9% 49.6% 54.3% 55.6% 45.3%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 35/35 1.1 3.7 68.9% 59.9% 48.7% 53.5% 42.0% 56.5% 41.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 19/19 0.9 3.6 68.5% 61.3% 46.8% 52.7% 43.6% 56.7% 43.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/22 0.6 3.2 70.1% 56.1% 49.0% 51.7% 47.4% 53.9% 40.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 10/10 0.4 3.9 70.1% 58.4% 45.6% 50.7% 39.2% 54.8% 37.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 23/24 0.6 3.0 75.3% 62.5% 44.7% 59.6% 49.4% 58.0% 42.5%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 32/34 0.7 3.4 73.1% 56.6% 44.4% 51.6% 50.4% 53.3% 47.1%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 21/28 1.0 3.4 74.1% 60.5% 42.3% 54.9% 43.0% 55.6% 44.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 19/20 1.4 2.8 75.0% 59.2% 46.8% 52.5% 41.4% 56.1% 42.3%
Career — 186/204 1.9 3.0 62.2% 64.0% 47.6% 53.9% 48.1% 57.9% 45.2% — 277/301 0.9 3.4 71.0% 59.3% 46.1% 53.1% 46.9% 55.4% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Emma Navarro Laura Siegemund
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2019 1475 102.2 -2.76 +0.02 0.819 44.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2020 1468 102.1 -2.13 -0.47 0.865 47.8% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2021 1482 104.5 -1.53 -1.10 0.919 48.2% — +33 — 40.0% -0.70 — 0–1 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2022 1535 104.7 -1.06 -1.72 0.729 43.8% — — — 14.3% -3.14 0–1 1–0 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2023 1736 136.8 -0.24 +1.20 1.037 50.9% -36 -75 -72 51.5% +0.23 4–4 (50%) 4–1 (80%) 104.1 -0.14 2010 1483 96.8 -2.49 -3.75 0.712 41.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.13
23 2024 1914 158.4 +2.88 +2.77 1.120 52.4% +5 -63 -70 61.0% +0.92 18–9 (67%) 6–8 (43%) 105.7 -0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2025 1856 149.2 +1.22 +4.15 1.137 52.8% +1 -70 +89 55.4% +0.42 10–12 (45%) 8–9 (47%) 96.1 +2.45 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2026 1911 139.7 +1.65 +0.56 1.041 50.9% -95 -73 +58 55.2% +0.35 11–10 (52%) 5–6 (45%) 98.8 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1495 114.5 +1.56 +0.48 1.094 52.5% — +47 — 50.0% +0.75 0–2 0–1 — -0.44
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1530 113.4 -1.13 +2.65 1.082 51.4% +25 0 — 44.0% -0.24 0–3 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 95.0 -0.28
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1747 132.7 +0.58 +2.35 1.047 51.0% -100 +75 -189 56.9% +0.36 11–4 (73%) 3–5 (38%) 106.8 -0.49
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1796 129.1 -1.81 +3.46 1.011 50.2% -247 +119 — 53.3% +0.10 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.0 -1.87
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1693 118.6 -0.34 +1.50 1.020 50.5% -147 +85 — 48.7% +0.23 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -1.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1667 125.7 +0.15 -0.92 0.946 48.8% -73 +57 — 43.2% -0.45 6–5 (55%) 1–4 (20%) 100.0 -0.71
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1789 142.4 +0.10 +1.20 1.003 50.0% -78 +22 — 52.3% +0.30 5–1 (83%) 0–2 — -1.05
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1732 132.3 -1.05 -1.02 0.881 47.5% +5 +47 -144 40.4% -0.75 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 100.6 -0.72
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1655 117.5 -0.88 -0.51 0.831 46.6% +18 +81 — 25.0% -1.25 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.75
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1801 135.1 +1.10 -0.24 1.012 50.5% +3 — — 53.4% +0.31 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 103.4 -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1740 133.5 -2.46 +2.44 1.008 50.2% +19 -18 — 53.2% +0.16 6–7 (46%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -0.05
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2025 1804 133.6 -0.54 +1.20 0.998 49.8% -13 -162 -31 49.2% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 98.8 -0.32
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2026 1749 132.0 +0.15 -0.46 0.964 49.2% -22 -29 -39 42.9% -0.41 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 97.9 -0.22
Career — 1994 149.9 +1.49 +2.11 1.073 51.6% -21 -61 +16 55.4% +0.45 43–37 (54%) 24–25 (49%) 100.9 +1.40 — 1852 137.5 -0.42 +1.03 0.989 49.8% -45 +46 -90 49.0% -0.07 55–51 (52%) 30–46 (39%) 95.4 -2.76

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.