Emma Raducanu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 0 | 5 | 5 | May 28, 2025 | H2H |
| Amanda Anisimova | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Jessica Pegula | 1 | 3 | 4 | Sep 29, 2025 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jul 25, 2025 | H2H |
| Marta Kostyuk | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 22, 2025 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Emma Raducanu vs Danielle Collins H2H: 0-1
Danielle Collins holds a 1–0 lead over Emma Raducanu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danielle Collins leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Danielle Collins won the 2025 Strasbourg Open second round 4-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | 4-6 6-1 6-3 | Emma Raducanu | Match data | May 21, 2025 | R16 | Strasbourg Open | WTA 500 | Clay |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emma Raducanu | #70 | #10 | 2,975 | 1,949 | 90 | 72 | 55.6% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Danielle Collins | #343 | #7 | 3,702 | 2,073 | 174 | 118 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2021 | 12–6 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,724 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #78 | 1,733 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #298 | 1,752 | 1 | 1 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #915 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #56 | 1,830 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #29 | 1,876 | 1 | 1 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #70 | 1,834 | 1 | 1 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #45 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,898 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #64 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2021 | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2024 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2026 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 57 | 49 | 106 | 53.8% | 13 | 13 | 26 | 50.0% | 20 | 10 | 30 | 66.7% | — | 111 | 79 | 190 | 58.4% | 52 | 28 | 80 | 65.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 150/164 of Emma Raducanu's and 279/293 of Danielle Collins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2021 | 18/18 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 68.5% | 69.9% | 43.1% | 58.9% | 38.2% | 61.2% | 45.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 34/34 | 2.9 | 3.2 | 67.8% | 63.1% | 47.4% | 53.4% | 53.1% | 58.1% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 10/11 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 62.8% | 65.7% | 49.3% | 53.4% | 33.3% | 59.2% | 41.0% | 2014 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 59.0% | 63.3% | 52.9% | 64.3% | 20.0% | 59.0% | 32.3% |
| 21 | 2024 | 31/32 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 64.5% | 63.7% | 46.5% | 63.3% | 51.1% | 57.7% | 45.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 39/48 | 3.5 | 2.8 | 65.8% | 65.3% | 47.0% | 58.2% | 51.8% | 59.1% | 45.6% | 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 26.9% | 42.9% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 34.0% | 36.6% |
| 23 | 2026 | 18/21 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 66.5% | 62.4% | 48.1% | 51.6% | 59.7% | 58.2% | 49.0% | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 56.3% | 37.0% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 35.4% | 40.0% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 30/35 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 58.0% | 60.3% | 46.2% | 47.0% | 47.7% | 54.1% | 41.8% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 35/36 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 59.4% | 62.0% | 47.0% | 51.0% | 52.5% | 56.2% | 41.8% |
| 26 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 16/16 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 58.9% | 71.1% | 48.3% | 61.6% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 43.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 52/52 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 54.6% | 70.3% | 48.5% | 54.9% | 54.3% | 60.2% | 46.1% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31/31 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 54.1% | 69.6% | 48.1% | 57.9% | 52.5% | 59.6% | 45.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36/36 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 59.0% | 67.2% | 47.2% | 55.1% | 48.1% | 58.8% | 42.2% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 50/54 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 56.5% | 71.1% | 47.4% | 58.9% | 52.9% | 60.8% | 45.4% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 26/30 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 49.5% | 55.1% | 51.5% | 58.8% | 41.9% |
| Career | — | 150/163 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 66.2% | 64.7% | 46.8% | 57.1% | 50.1% | 58.7% | 45.5% | — | 279/293 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 57.0% | 67.2% | 47.7% | 54.9% | 51.3% | 58.7% | 43.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Emma Raducanu | Danielle Collins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2021 | 1725 | 136.6 | +2.85 | +1.24 | 1.176 | 53.0% | -9 | — | -66 | 69.4% | +1.25 | 1–1 | 2–0 | — | +0.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2022 | 1733 | 139.2 | +0.89 | +1.65 | 1.068 | 51.5% | -16 | -140 | -90 | 54.3% | +0.66 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.0 | +0.76 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2023 | 1752 | 128.8 | +1.74 | -0.36 | 1.004 | 49.6% | +1 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.05 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.50 | 2014 | 1498 | 107.7 | +4.54 | +2.42 | 0.787 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.24 |
| 21 | 2024 | 1831 | 142.8 | +1.02 | +2.56 | 1.074 | 51.9% | -42 | -221 | -10 | 59.7% | +0.57 | 3–6 (33%) | 7–3 (70%) | 100.1 | -0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2025 | 1876 | 156.8 | +2.63 | +3.27 | 1.114 | 52.2% | -27 | -153 | -7 | 57.4% | +0.41 | 4–8 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 97.7 | -2.21 | 2016 | 1492 | 98.2 | -2.62 | -4.63 | 0.555 | 35.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 23 | 2026 | 1834 | 130.1 | +0.91 | +3.09 | 1.174 | 53.4% | -25 | — | +99 | 55.8% | +0.40 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.6 | +1.17 | 2017 | 1484 | 100.8 | -2.48 | +1.44 | 0.619 | 37.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1659 | 126.6 | -1.48 | -1.03 | 0.910 | 48.1% | +14 | -93 | -38 | 46.8% | -0.30 | 9–4 (69%) | 2–2 (50%) | 106.1 | +0.97 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1717 | 138.4 | -0.18 | -0.13 | 0.953 | 49.3% | -18 | -87 | -80 | 51.3% | -0.12 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.1 | -1.21 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1813 | 147.3 | +3.14 | +1.35 | 1.131 | 52.7% | -60 | -109 | — | 60.0% | +0.85 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -1.27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1891 | 152.7 | +3.13 | +2.70 | 1.158 | 53.3% | +4 | -43 | — | 71.3% | +1.40 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–3 (70%) | 107.5 | +0.72 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1898 | 149.2 | +2.47 | +2.92 | 1.117 | 52.3% | +79 | -119 | — | 66.2% | +0.81 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–3 (67%) | 99.8 | +0.10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1855 | 153.7 | +2.52 | +1.03 | 1.025 | 50.4% | +53 | — | — | 53.6% | +0.20 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–7 (42%) | 91.8 | -2.00 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1951 | 160.8 | +3.69 | +3.10 | 1.157 | 53.2% | -11 | +71 | -239 | 68.1% | +1.30 | 9–7 (56%) | 7–1 (88%) | 104.9 | -1.22 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1860 | 143.1 | +1.81 | -0.05 | 1.019 | 50.4% | -7 | +142 | -159 | 50.7% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.4 | -0.97 |
| Career | — | 1950 | 150.9 | +1.66 | +2.25 | 1.102 | 52.0% | -22 | -160 | -9 | 58.0% | +0.56 | 15–24 (38%) | 22–18 (55%) | 97.0 | -0.39 | — | 2074 | 154.6 | +2.01 | +1.46 | 1.057 | 51.3% | +14 | -3 | -124 | 59.0% | +0.55 | 49–46 (52%) | 38–24 (61%) | 107.7 | -1.76 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Danielle Collins
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jul 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 24, 2025 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 6, 2024 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 5 | 0 | 5 | May 12, 2024 | H2H |