H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Emmanuelle Gagliardi vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 0-1
Stephanie Foretz Gacon holds a 1–0 lead over Emmanuelle Gagliardi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2006 Prague third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 45
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2006* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | 6-3 6-3 | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emmanuelle Gagliardi | #736 | #42 | 781 | 1,695 | 117 | 182 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Stephanie Foretz Gacon | — | — | — | 1,647 | 61 | 115 | 34.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Emmanuelle Gagliardi | Stephanie Foretz Gacon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #123 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #78 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #101 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–12 | 47.8% | — | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 12–15 | 44.4% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #95 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–10 | 23.1% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #69 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #61 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #56 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #105 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #95 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #115 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2007 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #131 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,406 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #261 | 1,401 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–10 | 50.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |