H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-0
Etsuko Inoue holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Etsuko Inoue leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1985 Tokyo Japan Open third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1985* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Etsuko Inoue | 6-1 6-2 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Etsuko Inoue | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |