H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-3
Kathy Horvath holds a 3–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1984 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 1984* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-1 6-0 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| Apr 26, 1984* | Orlando | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 0-6 6-2 6-0 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| Sep 17, 1981* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Etsuko Inoue | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |