H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Etsuko Inoue vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 0-2
Patricia Medrado holds a 2–0 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Medrado leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Patricia Medrado won the 1986 Lugano second round 4-6 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 69
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 1986* | Lugano | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 4-6 7-6 7-5 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| May 23, 1984* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Patricia Medrado | 6-3 6-1 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Patricia Medrado | #359 | #67 | 9 | 1,837 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Etsuko Inoue | Patricia Medrado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,649 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 38–20 | 65.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 33–25 | 56.9% | — | 1,779 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #108 | 1,588 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,542 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,562 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #180 | 1,474 | 0 | 10 |