H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Eugenie Bouchard vs Casey Dellacqua H2H: 1-0
Eugenie Bouchard holds a 1–0 lead over Casey Dellacqua in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eugenie Bouchard leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eugenie Bouchard won the 2014 Australian Open fourth round 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 41
Left-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2014* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Eugenie Bouchard | 6-7(5) 6-2 6-0 | Casey Dellacqua | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Casey Dellacqua | #932 | #26 | 1,725 | 1,761 | 79 | 105 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eugenie Bouchard | Casey Dellacqua | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #157 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #53 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1002 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #227 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #134 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #101 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #29 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #116 | 1,629 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |