H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:30 UTC
Eugenie Bouchard vs Karin Knapp H2H: 2-0
Eugenie Bouchard holds a 2–0 lead over Karin Knapp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Eugenie Bouchard leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Eugenie Bouchard won the 2014 Nuremberg semifinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2014* | Nuremberg | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Eugenie Bouchard | 6-4 6-3 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2012 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Eugenie Bouchard | 6-2 7-6(4) | Karin Knapp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eugenie Bouchard | #1,002 | #5 | 4,793 | 1,926 | 156 | 144 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Eugenie Bouchard | Karin Knapp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2011 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #305 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2012 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #147 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2013 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #32 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #7 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2015 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #49 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #81 | 1,604 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2018 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2019 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #215 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–4 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2021 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #253 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #326 | 1,630 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2023 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #287 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #1002 | 1,609 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |