H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Eugenie Bouchard vs Lauren Davis H2H: 2-2

Eugenie Bouchard and Lauren Davis are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Eugenie Bouchard leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Lauren Davis leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lauren Davis won the 2019 Washington Open first round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Eugenie Bouchard
Canada Age 32 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Lauren Davis
United States Age 32 Right-Handed 157 cm / 5'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lauren Davis #75 6-1 6-2 Eugenie Bouchard #114 Match data Aug 1, 2019* R32 Washington Open International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Eugenie Bouchard #74 6-1 6-3 Lauren Davis #34 Match data Aug 23, 2017* R32 New Haven Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Lauren Davis #66 6-3 6-1 Eugenie Bouchard #7 Match data Apr 9, 2015* R32 Charleston Open Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Eugenie Bouchard #31 6-2 6-2 Lauren Davis #68 Match data Jan 19, 2014* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Eugenie Bouchard #1,002 #5 4,793 1,927 158 147 51.8% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lauren Davis #499 #26 1,646 1,837 143 182 44.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Lauren Davis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2011 1–3 25.0% #305 1,492 0 0 2011 0–3 0.0% #319 1,469 0 0
18 2012 5–4 55.6% #147 1,546 0 0 2012 4–6 40.0% #91 1,496 0 0
19 2013 25–17 59.5% #32 1,751 0 0 2013 13–17 43.3% #70 1,575 0 0
20 2014 39–23 62.9% #7 1,862 0 1 2014 21–20 51.2% #55 1,654 0 0
21 2015 12–17 41.4% #49 1,701 0 1 2015 13–21 38.2% #88 1,579 0 0
22 2016 29–24 54.7% #46 1,697 0 1 2016 15–9 62.5% #61 1,699 0 0
23 2017 11–20 35.5% #81 1,601 0 1 2017 20–22 47.6% #50 1,624 0 1
24 2018 11–13 45.8% #87 1,670 0 1 2018 2–6 25.0% #173 1,603 0 1
25 2019 4–10 28.6% #215 1,617 0 1 2019 9–12 42.9% #64 1,733 0 1
26 2020 10–4 71.4% #141 1,713 0 1 2020 5–9 35.7% #75 1,622 0 1
27 2021 4–3 57.1% #253 1,704 0 1 2021 12–16 42.9% #89 1,646 0 1
28 2022 3–5 37.5% #326 1,632 0 1 2022 13–17 43.3% #87 1,714 0 1
29 2023 3–3 50.0% #287 1,637 0 1 2023 14–16 46.7% #68 1,682 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2024 0–5 0.0% #270 1,625 0 2
31 2025 1–1 50.0% — 1,610 0 1 2025 2–3 40.0% #362 1,592 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Lauren Davis
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2011 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2012 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 2013 15 11 26 57.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
20 2014 18 16 34 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2014 13 12 25 52.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2015 10 9 19 52.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2015 7 14 21 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 2016 20 16 36 55.6% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2016 15 6 21 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 2017 14 13 27 51.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
24 2018 7 10 17 41.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2018 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2019 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2019 5 8 13 38.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 2020 2 1 3 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% — — — — 2020 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
27 2021 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2021 5 9 14 35.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 3 7 57.1%
28 2022 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — 2022 6 8 14 42.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 2023 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2023 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2025 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2025 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 98 101 199 49.2% 45 29 74 60.8% 15 17 32 46.9% — 97 113 210 46.2% 25 41 66 37.9% 21 28 49 42.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 282/306 of Eugenie Bouchard's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Lauren Davis
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2011 4/4 2.0 2.5 64.1% 64.4% 38.1% 59.9% 56.7% 54.8% 34.9% 2011 3/3 0.7 3.0 49.5% 55.1% 40.4% 46.3% 16.7% 47.3% 23.6%
18 2012 9/9 3.7 3.1 58.4% 66.2% 47.0% 58.4% 39.6% 58.4% 43.0% 2012 10/10 1.0 2.2 66.5% 59.2% 48.6% 48.5% 36.9% 55.6% 42.9%
19 2013 34/42 2.3 2.6 56.8% 64.2% 47.1% 51.2% 44.0% 56.7% 46.5% 2013 23/30 0.7 2.6 62.6% 56.8% 42.6% 49.6% 41.8% 51.6% 39.9%
20 2014 57/62 2.6 3.1 60.4% 66.0% 47.6% 54.0% 50.3% 58.5% 46.5% 2014 38/41 0.8 2.9 63.1% 60.7% 42.4% 47.5% 42.8% 54.0% 42.8%
21 2015 25/29 1.7 4.0 60.1% 62.4% 47.7% 49.2% 48.0% 56.8% 41.5% 2015 29/34 1.0 4.4 64.0% 63.0% 46.0% 43.8% 54.2% 56.8% 40.7%
22 2016 50/54 2.3 3.2 60.4% 63.6% 48.8% 50.2% 45.9% 57.8% 44.7% 2016 19/24 1.6 2.9 59.7% 62.9% 44.5% 51.5% 50.5% 55.7% 45.3%
23 2017 28/31 2.3 3.5 58.3% 58.7% 45.0% 49.3% 48.3% 53.0% 42.7% 2017 41/42 1.4 5.6 60.5% 59.3% 40.8% 50.4% 56.0% 52.1% 47.6%
24 2018 24/24 3.0 3.6 59.2% 63.1% 44.0% 57.2% 46.4% 55.5% 44.2% 2018 8/8 1.5 6.3 59.3% 57.6% 37.5% 54.0% 48.6% 49.5% 41.6%
25 2019 14/14 1.3 4.0 60.7% 60.7% 42.3% 50.0% 54.0% 53.3% 42.9% 2019 21/21 1.6 3.4 61.4% 60.2% 48.6% 60.3% 50.7% 55.7% 41.3%
26 2020 14/14 2.8 1.8 65.5% 65.3% 49.8% 61.5% 49.6% 59.8% 45.5% 2020 14/14 1.4 1.7 66.5% 57.2% 45.3% 49.9% 52.1% 53.2% 43.2%
27 2021 7/7 2.7 2.9 62.7% 65.2% 45.7% 49.6% 50.9% 57.9% 46.8% 2021 28/28 1.9 3.0 55.3% 63.8% 44.5% 46.1% 45.0% 55.1% 42.0%
28 2022 8/8 2.8 1.5 57.0% 61.4% 51.7% 60.8% 45.3% 57.3% 42.6% 2022 30/30 2.1 3.4 56.8% 64.4% 42.8% 50.4% 50.5% 54.9% 42.7%
29 2023 6/6 2.3 1.7 66.8% 62.6% 52.8% 41.7% 51.9% 59.0% 43.5% 2023 30/30 1.6 3.4 61.1% 61.0% 45.3% 48.1% 52.8% 54.9% 42.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 5/5 0.6 3.0 56.6% 48.9% 39.4% 44.0% 51.9% 43.5% 35.7%
31 2025 2/2 1.0 2.0 62.0% 59.5% 47.9% 54.2% 37.4% 55.1% 41.8% 2025 5/5 0.8 1.6 57.8% 48.9% 44.0% 47.2% 43.9% 47.3% 41.8%
Career — 282/306 2.4 3.1 60.0% 63.5% 47.1% 52.6% 47.7% 56.9% 44.5% — 304/325 1.4 3.5 60.8% 60.5% 43.8% 49.3% 48.9% 53.9% 42.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Eugenie Bouchard Lauren Davis
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2011 1493 102.7 -1.04 -2.27 0.773 45.8% +18 — — 33.3% -1.78 0–1 1–0 — -0.10 2011 1469 96.1 -1.99 -3.92 0.448 35.8% +25 — — 0.0% -3.83 — 0–1 — +0.06
18 2012 1546 114.3 +1.12 -0.43 1.033 50.7% +7 — — 52.4% +0.38 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.18 2012 1497 108.5 -1.41 -0.02 0.967 49.1% +2 +46 — 42.9% -0.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.28
19 2013 1752 141.5 +1.07 +2.65 1.074 51.5% -37 -74 -156 58.2% +0.47 7–9 (44%) 8–1 (89%) 106.1 -1.18 2013 1576 111.7 -3.39 -2.88 0.824 45.7% +11 -54 -36 40.6% -1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–2 (75%) 108.1 -0.03
20 2014 1863 150.8 +2.70 +3.29 1.122 52.4% -96 +19 -107 61.4% +0.82 10–8 (56%) 7–5 (58%) 104.2 -1.19 2014 1654 126.2 -1.49 -0.23 0.930 48.3% -1 -154 +33 51.1% -0.11 6–4 (60%) 5–1 (83%) 105.7 +0.07
21 2015 1702 123.0 -1.20 +0.51 0.961 49.3% +34 +67 -27 50.0% -0.02 3–7 (30%) 6–5 (55%) 94.8 +1.50 2015 1580 117.4 -0.82 -0.57 0.941 48.6% -2 -59 +76 36.0% -1.15 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 103.8 -1.82
22 2016 1697 133.5 +1.68 +1.09 1.060 51.1% -16 +85 -6 54.6% +0.26 8–7 (53%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 -1.41 2016 1699 128.3 -1.36 +1.29 1.023 50.4% +49 — — 57.1% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.7 -0.31
23 2017 1602 127.4 -1.89 -0.77 0.909 47.9% -17 +221 +25 40.3% -0.82 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.2 -0.95 2017 1624 128.1 -3.03 +3.62 0.995 50.0% +63 -69 -64 47.4% -0.11 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 99.9 +0.39
24 2018 1670 127.3 -0.75 +1.08 0.994 49.8% -14 +151 — 42.2% -0.31 2–1 (67%) 5–0 (100%) 106.6 +0.16 2018 1603 108.4 -2.94 -0.71 0.824 45.7% +42 — — 30.0% -1.00 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +0.10
25 2019 1617 127.0 -1.49 -0.31 0.919 47.9% +26 — — 38.2% -0.62 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.76 2019 1734 133.2 -0.71 -1.22 0.932 48.8% -2 -166 -55 43.2% -0.39 3–1 (75%) 1–2 (33%) 103.3 -0.90
26 2020 1713 127.8 +1.82 +1.44 1.130 52.7% -64 +114 — 65.7% +1.00 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.7 +0.41 2020 1623 118.4 -2.04 -0.34 0.923 48.3% +39 — — 40.6% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 96.2 -0.17
27 2021 1704 112.6 +0.44 +0.05 1.114 52.1% -53 — — 53.3% +0.40 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.45 2021 1646 122.0 -1.24 -0.82 0.936 48.4% -3 -115 +89 42.6% -0.66 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 101.0 -0.59
28 2022 1633 117.1 +0.22 +0.59 0.998 50.2% -38 — — 52.9% +0.18 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 97.2 +0.57 2022 1715 129.3 -1.29 -0.08 0.947 48.7% -7 -84 -9 42.4% -0.62 4–4 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 99.0 -1.24
29 2023 1637 118.3 +0.17 -0.98 1.060 51.3% — +151 — 53.3% +0.13 1–2 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 99.7 +1.03 2023 1682 126.0 -1.26 -0.82 0.950 48.9% +20 -11 -71 50.7% -0.24 5–8 (38%) 6–0 (100%) 100.9 -0.58
30 2024 1618 100.0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1625 96.9 -3.79 -3.39 0.631 39.9% — — — 9.1% -3.18 0–1 0–1 — -0.30
31 2025 1611 113.9 +1.04 -0.76 0.931 48.7% — — — 50.0% -0.17 1–1 — — 0.00 2025 1593 110.2 -1.83 -2.46 0.794 44.6% +38 — — 33.3% -1.42 2–0 — — 0.00
Career — 1927 140.4 +0.68 +1.24 1.032 50.6% -27 +65 -55 53.1% +0.19 43–57 (43%) 45–29 (61%) 102.0 -0.43 — 1838 128.2 -1.76 -0.15 0.925 48.3% +20 -77 +9 43.9% -0.54 53–48 (52%) 39–29 (57%) 108.1 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.